User talk:Arafael

Tags
Why do you keep removing my tags? Do you even know what they mean and what they're used for?

If you're not sure what you're doing, please take a moment to read policies and guidelines from the welcome kit.

Likeminas (talk) 18:09, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page War of the Pacific has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 21:32, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

War of the Pacific
Hola Arafael,

he solicitado tu cooperacion en la discusion de War of the Pacific.

Saludos,

--Keysanger (talk) 21:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Hola Arafael,

he borrado tu POV porque no entiendo el hilo de la discusion. Hay varias personas interesadas participando en diferentes partes con preguntas y respuestas cruzadas y con nuevas contribuciones y cambios. En fin, creo que nadie sabe cual es el estado atual de la discusion.

He agregado en parte tus argumentos sobre los deseos de Argentina de hacer la guerra contra Chile.

Te ruego que comienzes una nueva seccion con los problemas actuales.

Saludos, --Keysanger (talk) 19:18, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

STOP DELETING MY REFERENCES
Hola Arafael,

has borrado mis rferencias por tercera vez. Si lo haces otra vez seras expulsado de la wikipedia.

--Keysanger (talk) 16:55, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

War of the Pacific Review
Sure. I could review the discussion. However, it might take some days before I post anything (I'm not a regular contributor to the article, so I have to analyze what happens).--&#91;&#124;!*//MarshalN20\\*!&#124;&#93; (talk) 17:32, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Framing the issue
We are waiting for your input at the "framing the issue" section on the war of the Pacific talk. Please try to add your question to the list of questions as soon as you can so that we can move forward. Gigs (talk) 01:01, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --posted by Keyssanger

Translation
I'd recommend you to write the text in Spanish, and then go to Dictionary.com's Translator. They have a good Spanish to English translator. Then post it in the article or send me a copy of the text through the talk page, and in either case I will check it for grammar errors. The basic thing is to provide sourced material that can be useful to present all points of view in the article. Keysanger's ownership of the article must be stopped for the sake of improving the article.-- MarshalN20 | T a l k 14:02, 6 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, I'll keep a check on the article. However, like I've mentioned in the talk page, I really won't take much part in the matter. Nonetheless, if there is ever any trouble coming up again, please do feel free to contact me and I'll be there to help.-- MarshalN20 | T a l k 23:57, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * ok. Arafael (talk) 13:12, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Pisco Sour
Arafael,

I just finished (relatively speaking) editing the Pisco Sour article. The article needs to improve the "background" and "aftermath" sections (which is where my research ran short). If we can improve those things, the article might as well end up becoming a GA-class one which we can then translate to Spanish. Best of wishes.-- MarshalN20 | T al k 20:06, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Muchas Gracias Arafael!-- MarshalN20 | T al k 21:02, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Acabo de nominar el articulo para que suba en el ranking: Talk:Pisco Sour. Si no hay algun problema, lo traducire al castellano. Saludos.-- MarshalN20 | T al k 23:52, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)