User talk:Aragorn8392

October 2013
Hello, I'm Bahooka. I noticed that you recently removed some content from F. King Alexander without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Bahooka (talk) 18:00, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to F. King Alexander, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Bahooka (talk) 18:05, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at F. King Alexander, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Bahooka (talk) 16:04, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Kern Alexander
Please do not simply remove critical (but referenced) sections from pages without stating a very good reason for doing so. If in doubt, use the article's talk page to find some kind of consensus. O.Koslowski (talk) 16:05, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:F. King Alexander, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bahooka (talk) 22:40, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Oxford Round Table shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 22:10, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Oxford Round Table, you may be blocked from editing. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 13:32, 2 November 2013 (UTC)


 * You did the right thing in filing a WP:BLP/N request to ask if the material should be deleted. However, it's not clear right now that it should, so I strongly suggest you wait and let some other editor make the deletion, if that's the action deemed most appropriate. —C.Fred (talk) 13:35, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

New talk page comments go at bottom of page
FYI, see WP:TOPPOST: "Start new topics at the bottom of the page: If you put a post at the top of the page, it is confusing and can easily be overlooked. The latest topic should be the one at the bottom of the page, then the next post will go underneath yours and so on. This makes it easy to see the chronological order of posts. A quick way to do this is to use the "New section" tab next to the "Edit" button on the talk page you are on. To avoid confusion, the latest comment in a thread should be posted in chronological order and not placed above earlier comments." Bahooka (talk) 20:45, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Welcome
Sorry about the delay in posting this. Hopefully better late than never! Bahooka (talk) 19:47, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Edit war on Oxford Round Table
Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Oxford Round Table.

While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and edit wars may be slow-moving, spanning weeks or months. Edit wars are not limited to 24 hours.

If you are unclear how to resolve a content dispute, please see dispute resolution. You are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus.

If you feel your edits might qualify as one of the small list of exceptions, please apply them with caution and ensure that anyone looking at your edits will come to the same conclusion. If you are uncertain, seek clarification before continuing. Quite a few editors have found themselves blocked for misunderstanding and/or misapplying these exceptions. Often times, requesting page protection or a sockppuppet investigation is a much better course of action.

Continued edit warring on Oxford Round Table or any other article may cause you to be blocked without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 17:54, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

February 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Oxford Round Table, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 20:41, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Your recent editing history at Oxford Round Table shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 05:30, 17 June 2014 (UTC)