User talk:Arasakacorp

Please refrain from removing majority/minority on the sejm page Misleading edits
The sejm page is semi-locked by my request, PiS is outvoted in every sejm vote there is so far. The parties in majority have signed a coalition agreement (expect for Left Together which has however signaled that it will support the new govt when it forms in votes of confidence) And although we can't add Goverment/Opposition signs just yet. Minority/Majority has already crystalized itself  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Octilllion (talk • contribs) 20:51, 26 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Also your edits have errors in them. KwIn as the short version for Confederation? (That's the shortening for the Korwin party) L for the left???? Octilllion (talk) 02:44, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Konfederacja participated in the elections as a party called Konfederacja Wolności i Niepodległość, thus the shortening, not a de iure coalition. Get your facts straight before correcting anyone.
 * BTW - KORWiN was already an acronym (Koalicja Odnowy Rzeczypospolitej Wolność i Równość) Arasakacorp (talk) 10:45, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Polish Affairs moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Polish Affairs, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... disco spinster   talk  21:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polish Affairs (June 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Polish Affairs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Polish Affairs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Polish_Affairs Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nathan2055&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Polish_Affairs reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nathan2055talk - contribs 15:41, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Polish Affairs moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Polish Affairs, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  scope_creep Talk  20:22, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Confederation of the Polish Crown, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Read the pages before making further reverts. Vacant0 (talk) 20:52, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Mate you're refering to an extremely laughable source in KORWiN article and putting religion into ideology box in KKP. Who's unconstructive here Arasakacorp (talk) 21:34, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

AGROunia editing
Hello, I saw your AGROunia edits - I want to let you know that calling the party "socially right-wing" is inappropiate and is not backed by any source. If you really want to dispute that, you need to find a credible source that directly calls this party that. Otherwise this is No original research. What we DO have is the party being called explicitly left-wing: "Agrounia to partia agrarna i socjaldemokratyczna. Zrzesza w swych kręgach głównie rolników, o poglądach lewicowych." or "AgroUnia to siła ludowa z wrażliwością lewicową".

Also regarding the sources you posted - arguing that opposing abortion makes a party "socially right-wing" alone is a pretty reductionist understanding of politics. It is also outdated in case of AGROunia given how Kołodziejczak did change his mind in 2023: "Michał Kołodziejczak zabrał głos ws. postulatu liberalizacji prawa aborcyjnego. – Proszę być spokojnym, ja kobietom przyklepię i zagłosuję tak, jak one będą chciały – powiedział lider Agrounii na antenie RMF FM." He also supports same-sex civil unions. Brat Forelli (talk) 17:46, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Polish election seats breakdown
Hi, I saw that you edited the number of seats won by PiS at the latest Polish election. Can I ask you what source did you use for that update? So far in updating party pages with the results I've relied on the figures in the Results section of 2023 Polish parliamentary election, but if you have some updated source I'll take care of updating the numbers for any party. It's just that at the moment different pages present unconsistent figures and I'd like to avoid that. Thanks, Fm3dici97 (talk) 18:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)


 * It should be a matter of a talk thread whether MPs affiliated and endorsed by parties like PiS should be counted in as member-MPs - e.g. in the 2023 elections article Paweł Kukiz is not listed as an elected MP of... Kukiz'15, because he's not a de iure member of his own party. This is a recurring theme with polish politicians, some are de facto members of their party despite not having a membership card. It's a matter of contextualization that's omitted by whoever made that table in the article.
 * BTW, there's no punishment for lying about your party affiliation, so the info from the PKW website might not be entirely true either Arasakacorp (talk) 19:42, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah I'm familiar with the issue, sadly it's not the only country where there's a discrepancy between party memberships, affiliations and formal parliamentary clubs. Anyways I'm asking because I'd like to have access to the seat count you're referring to (or, if it's not a single source, I'd ask you to make a summary) so that I can intervene in all the (many) pages revolving around the seats result of the election. Thanks again, Fm3dici97 (talk) 07:06, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo Nowa Nadzieja.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Logo Nowa Nadzieja.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Sejm. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Untamed1910 (talk) 02:43, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo agrounia.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Logo agrounia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:18, 23 January 2024 (UTC)