User talk:Aravindude

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 13:39, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of CSS Corp


A tag has been placed on CSS Corp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Diannaa (talk) 14:08, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello Aravindude. The page was deleted for notability reasons, that is, the organization is not considered notable enough for a Wikipedia article. If you have any furhter questions regarding the deletion, please contact the deleting administrator (user:Peridon). — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:20, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CSS Corp Logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:CSS Corp Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Reply to your email
Please note that we use talk pages for most communication - the email link is for things that are best kept out of public view. As to your article, Wikipedia is not a directory, and the vast majority of companies do not have and will not have articles. Size is not a factor, and nor is turnover or profit. Please read WP:CORP about notability for companies, and WP:RS about the reliable independent sources needed to prove the notability. I also advise reading WP:COI about editing subjects you are very close to, and also WP:TOU (our terms of use) as editing as part of your job or for any financial reward MUST be declared. Your use of 'we' in your mail implies that you are employed by the company or an owner of it, or are working on their behalf as an agent. If any of these are the case, you are advised not to edit about the company, but if you do, your connection must be declared. I would finish by pointing out that certain types of business are more in the public eye than are others. I remember a company whose products are on the tables of millions of Americans every day - but they have no article. They make own brand goods for chain stores - everything that leaves their factory carries another company's name and address. No coverage in the reliable independent sources. Other types of business are virtually unknown outside a very small circle of customers because they are highly specialised. Is this fair? Maybe not, but it is the way Wikipedia works. If we did not restrict things, we'd be another Facebook and not an encyclopaedia. Peridon (talk) 11:32, 25 January 2016 (UTC)