User talk:Arbies92

Hello, Arbies92, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help How to write a great article Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there.

Unrated Allmusic reviews
I have undone a few of these edits, but after taking a look into your contribs and noticing you have done this to several articles, I thought leaving you a message would be more effective. Although I would like to thank you for your contributing actual reviews from Allmusic, it is not constructive to add unrated links. It really doesn't make much sense to add links from unrated Allmusic pages to the "Professional reviews" of album infoboxes as you have done here and here. Fezmar9 (talk) 15:37, 4 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Well you can absolutely do that, but do you see how it doesn't make much sense to add a reference to the reviews section? If you want to make a reference, place your source between these tags, then at the bottom of the article add a reference section with, if one does not already exist. Fezmar9 (talk) 15:33, 5 August 2009 (UTC)


 * On the same note as the above, please don't add links that are only ratings with no actual review. For example, your edit to Forget the World added an Allmusic rating and link, but the Allmusic entry has only a tracklist and rating...no review at all. Since this is a "professional reviews" section, not a "professional ratings" section, we are only interested in links that contain actual critical analysis and review, not merely a rating. You can read more about using reviews in the infobox at WP:ALBUMS. Thanks. --IllaZilla (talk) 17:44, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, please don't just add a bare link; please format it as an inline reference, like I did with this diff. Just putting "link" is frowned upon. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 23:10, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Arbies92! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:17, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Estong Ballesteros -

Albums
Reviews aren't supposed to go in the Infobox album template anymore. They're supposed to be cited and elaborated on in the text, preferably in a "critical reception" section. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:34, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Are you just plain not listening to me or what? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 03:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Deletion nomination of Template:2009-10 San Antonio Spurs playoffs game log
Hi Arbies92, this is a message from an automated bot, regarding Template:2009-10 San Antonio Spurs playoffs game log. You blanked the page and, since you are its sole author, FrescoBot has interpreted it as a request for deletion of the page and asked administrators to satisfy the requests per speedy deletion criterion G7. Next time you want a page that you've created deleted, you can explicitly request the deletion by inserting the text. If you didn't want the page deleted, please remove the tag from the page and undo your blanking or put some content in the page. Admins are able to recover deleted pages. Please do not contact the bot operator for issues not related with bot's behaviour. To opt out of these bot messages, add somewhere on your talk page. -- FrescoBot  (msg) 05:46, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:51, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 The Baddest Female (song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Jamesx12345 (talk) 18:40, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Proposed deletion of Jay-R Reyes


The article Jay-R Reyes has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article of unclear notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wikicology (talk) 23:41, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Dennis Daa for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dennis Daa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dennis Daa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:43, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Norman Gonzales for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Norman Gonzales is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Norman Gonzales until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:42, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Paolo Mendoza


The article Paolo Mendoza has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 13:08, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2022
Your edit to Jason Keep has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. —Bagumba (talk) 05:42, 23 September 2022 (UTC)