User talk:ArcAngel/Archive0014

Science and Mathematics Academy
Hey, ArcAngel. I had a question concerning your redirection of Science and Mathematics Academy to Aberdeen High School. Since this is a county-wide program, I do not think it should be listed under a city-wide school, even if it is located in it. Perhaps, I am astray, but could you lead me to a Wikipedia article saying that this is so. Thanks, --RickNightCrawler (talk) 22:50, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Reply
ArcAngel, Well in that case, shouldn't Math Academy (Santa Cruz High School) be filed under its associated high school, as well as Rockdale Magnet School, Science Math and Technology Magnet Program, and Mandarin Immersion Program. In my browsing, I noticed no pattern in whether or not they should be filed under their respective physical location or under their magnet program. --RickNightCrawler (talk) 20:23, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Adminship
Hello. I noticed you are in Category:Wikipedia administrator hopefuls. Since you seem like an experienced and trustworthy editor, would you like me to nominate you for adminship? Just give me a shout if you would. Thanks! --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:24, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * So should I ask again in maybe a month or two? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:30, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Deleted Post?!
Why has my post been deleted. I sourced the site and I have permission from the site owner. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Charmed4lyfe3 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Please read this section to understand why it was deleted.    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 23:57, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Madeline (musician) PROD
Hi, ArcAngel; thanks for your concern about my recently posted article. I have taken note of your mentioning that no reliable sources were listed, and that the primary source was an unreliable social networking site (the artist's myspace page). I have since changed the listed website within the artist's Infobox to her official website and will remove your PROD from the page to avoid deletion within seven days by an administrator. Thank you for your interest in helping this article meet wikipedia's standards. —StaggerBuzz (talk) 01:22, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but unless you can provide some reliable, third-party sources that contain significant coverage of her, then the article still doesn't meet the standards for inclusion. I will give some time for such links to be included, after which the article might be sent to AfD by other editors who feel that the article doesn't contain enough neutral sourcing.     ArcAngel    (talk) ) 01:30, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Okay, I will see what I can find. Thanks again for the direction. —StaggerBuzz (talk) 01:40, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

My apologies
ArcAngel,

I apologize if I offended you with the redirects I created. As they were directed towards a profanity-related article, I thought that profanity-related redirects would be appropriate. I do not feel that my edits constitute vandalism, however I will not object if you delete the redirects I created. Sincerely, Neelix (talk) 02:17, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Whoa there - I never directly stated that your redirects were vandalism - only that they were unnecessarily creating redirects that don't really need to exist.    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 02:20, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Dave Bautista confusion
I did not make the edit to the Bautista article that said he died, I tried to revert the information, but if there was a problem with how it looked, then I apologize for that. Rollinman (talk) 16:20, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Yea, my bad on that. That message wasn't meant for you, sorry.     ArcAngel    (talk) ) 21:12, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Categories
You don't need to create categories that are red-linked. Sometimes a red-linked category is in place because of the way templates automatically apply parent categories, but unless there is sufficient content to place in the category, it doesn't have to be created. Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:50, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * However, the redlinked categories I am entering content for DO contain at least one subcategory, therefore the redlinked cat would be misleading, no? Trying to improve things here, ya know.    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 22:52, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * One subcategory does not "substantial content" make, in most cases. If I were you, I would first focus on working out the difference between Category:900s and Category:900s BC before you work in these by-year categories any more. Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:56, 29 April 2010 (UTC)