User talk:ArcAngel/Archive0018

New England Estuarine Research Society
Today's entry "New England Estuarine Research Society" got a speedy delete for being an organization. But it is affiliated with the "Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation" entry and the "Atlantic Estuarine Research Society" entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NRSshale (talk • contribs) 20:20, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Either way, the deleting admin agreed with my tagging, so you might want to take it up with them.    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 20:36, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Beth Rogers
The wikipedia article about Beth Rogers should not be deleted as she is an academic who meets the criteria for notability (WP:academic). Reliable evidence will be added soon. Beccys87 (talk) 22:27, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * It's not up to me, it's up to the deciding admin whether or not it should be kept.    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 22:32, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

WQA notice to Kenatipo
Thanks for the heads-up. -- Kenatipo  speak! 19:49, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

I can't believe this schmuck. Now he's going through the "Oppose" votes and tagging them JUSTAVOTE and recommending they not count, including mine! How much of this crap do I have to put up with? -- Kenatipo  speak! 20:22, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Wow, that is a stretch I must say. Sounds like he is trying to push his POV on the article, which is not allowed.  All we can do now is wait and see if an admin gets involved.    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 20:32, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Sarek the Vulcan removed the "tags" and he's an admin. -- Kenatipo   speak! 21:25, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Yea, I noticed that. But now on WQA he's trying to drag me into that whole mess.     ArcAngel    (talk) ) 21:31, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Issues
I wanted to write and express my regrets regarding the sharp tone of my reply to you when you defended User:Kenatipo on the etiquette noticeboard. I was out of place in doing so, I hope you'll understand that by that point I was quite exasperated by the above noted user's extreme uncooperative attitude and tone he was employing while accusing me of bad faith, leading me to lash out at you which was fully inappropriate. I'm not sure that there's a policy for this but should you seek a limited time ban over the incident based on a policy I am unaware of, I would not dispute it. Hope this clears up any animosity we may have and that we will be able to work together to improve various articles on the site, albeit with different perspectives. WikiManOne 03:07, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the apology. I am not one to seek out retribution for comments made in the "heat of the moment", so no biggie.  :)     ArcAngel    (talk) ) 03:11, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Re: Madden NFL
No problem. I figured it was something like that, once in a while my finger accidentally hits rollback, so I know that feeling. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 20:27, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

WikiManOne collapses ArcAngel!!!!
Hi, ArcAngel. wmo collapsed that section and marked it "irrelevant". I saw it and added the verbiage "(per wmo)". I agree with your complete uncollapse. -- Kenatipo  speak! 16:33, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I thought the section was still relevant, and it's bad form to collapse sections at ANI anyway (I've been told not to do that myself).     ArcAngel    (talk) ) 16:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

popups
Hi, ArcAngel. remember this exchange? ::::If you have pop-ups enabled, simply hover over his name and it will tell you the permissions of a specific editor. It does say "sysop" for Jayron, so he is indeed an admin. I also have added js code that highlights the names of any admin so I can easily pick them out in my list of changes.  ArcAngel    (talk) ) 05:47, 9 February 2011 (UTC)  :::::ArcAngel, my popups say User:Jayron32 and User talk:Jayron32 when I hover.  That's all.  -- Kenatipo   speak! 17:08, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm using Mozilla Firefox and Vista Home Premium. Any ideas or suggestions?  -- Kenatipo   speak! 19:21, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Is Javascript enabled in your preferences? That's the only thing I can think of.     ArcAngel    (talk) ) 21:15, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I went into preferences and checked every box on every tab that said anything about JavaScript, and, it worked! Thank you!  -- Kenatipo   speak! 21:53, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * You're welcome, glad to help out.    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 21:55, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for fixing the numbering. I think we were both on that RFA page at the same time, and in my feeble attempt to add a comment and fix number, I think it might have made it worse. Thank you for cleaning up any mess I may have caused. :) Pax85 (talk) 07:35, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Not a problem. :)     ArcAngel    (talk) ) 07:44, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Gentlemen Hall / user:Ralphydanman
Thanks for your comments at user talk:Ralphydanman. Bands are not my area of expertise, so your detailed comments were useful. I've suggested that Ralphydanman continue to work on the article in userspace in the meantime, so that if the band does meet WP:BAND in future, then the article will be ready to move to mainspace. This is a new editor to Wikipedia, so I'm trying to avoid biting him. If the article was moved to mainspace at the moment, it would only result in the inevitable deletion via AfD, which could then mean we lose another editor. Mjroots (talk) 08:42, 15 February 2011 (UTC) Well, I figured it would help if it was explained why the band isn't notable at the present time so that he can get some insight as to what would establish notability for them in the future.  ArcAngel    (talk) ) 08:45, 15 February 2011 (UTC)