User talk:ArcAngel/Archive0023

July 2011
I am new to this and home I am dong this correctly. I appreciate your comments regarding proposed deletion of Chamber Music Charleston. I have just added more links to outside media coverage of past Chamber Music Charleston events, in hopes that this will add credibility to the article? Please let me know if there is any more I can do. Thank you! Buttercat09 (talk) 13:19, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Afd - lewinski
No reason is there at all - the nomination is pointy indeed - the user supports the other sex neo and imo supports this one as well - there is no deletion rationale at all. AFD is not for confirmation. Off2riorob (talk) 21:45, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Blanking it is not the proper way to do it Rob, so I am going to ask for admin advice here.    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 21:49, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * This is not a AFD rationale http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2011_July_2 - Off2riorob (talk) 21:51, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

I've never seen anything quite like it. However it could be argued that it was a malformed AFD, and those are sometimes deleted. Anyone can file a new AFD, so I don't see any permanent harm.  Will Beback   talk    21:58, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Completely new abortion proposal and mediation
In light of the seemingly endless disputes over their respective titles, a neutral mediator has crafted a proposal to rename the two major abortion articles (pro-life/anti-abortion movement, and pro-choice/abortion rights movement) to completely new names. The idea, which is located here, is currently open for opinions. As you have been a contributor in the past to at least one of the articles, your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated.

The hope is that, if a consensus can be reached on the article titles, the energy that has been spent debating the titles of the articles here and here can be better spent giving both articles some much needed improvement to their content. Please take some time to read the proposal and weigh in on the matter. Even if your opinion is simple indifference, that opinion would be valuable to have posted.

To avoid concerns that this notice might violate WP:CANVASS, this posting is being made to every non-anon editor who has edited either page (or either page's respective talk page) since 1 July 2010, irrespective of possible previous participation at the mediation page. HuskyHuskie (talk) 20:57, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Closing RfAs
Hi, here's a checklist for RfA SNOW closes, most points also apply for closing withdrawn requests. For next time. :) Amalthea  11:09, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for that. There should be a link on the RFA page (like there is on the AFD page) for non-admin closures.  :)  How badly did I muck it up?    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 11:21, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * No worries, I believe you only missed adding it to a second log, and of course untranscluding it from WP:RfA. And I just looked, instructions are also at WP:Bureaucrats. Cheers, Amalthea  11:34, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok. Yea, forgot about untranscluding it (DOH!).  But I looked at the history of the second log, and there weren't any recent edits on it, so I must have been looking at another history of it somehow.  Oh, you had the closer incorrect on that log, so I went ahead and fixed that small thing.  :)    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 11:41, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Heh, classic. I believe popups betrayed me when I tried to copy&paste your name, sometimes it eats my keyboard events. Amalthea  11:47, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Yea, I've had TW do that too me too sometimes. Thanks again for that little tidbit of knowledge you threw my way.  Every little bit helps!  :)     ArcAngel    (talk) ) 11:50, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Cindy Dolenc
Hi. I noticed you gave some attention to Cindy Dolenc. Perhaps you'd like to comment on Articles_for_deletion/Cindy_Dolenc as well? Debresser (talk) 12:51, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * When I get done with my research on her, I certainly will.    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 13:07, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Sand 3
Sorry that articel was moved by mistake, please do go ahead and deleate, thanks. U6j65 (talk) 13:38, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Katarrama
Sources do not have to be in English, and I consequently removed your Prod. (See WP:NONENG). Whether the sources are actually good enough is another matter--it's not a subject field in which I can evaluate them.  DGG ( talk ) 15:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

MSTS Revert
Sorry about the sites, just replaced them with general statistics from the two sites. (Each has completely different libraries so I was able to add up the totals, still working around other 3rd Party websites.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by David1544 (talk • contribs) 01:21, July 12, 2011
 * Why do you feel this is encyclopedic content? To me, it's trivial information along with original reasearch.     ArcAngel    (talk) ) 09:33, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * If you want I will cite the pages that contain the download numbers. David1544 (talk) 15:21, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
 * It's a moot point per WP:BIGNUMBER.    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 17:54, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Question
I asked why WWE '12 won't be on the PlayStation 2 console on the WWE '12 talk page, how was one little question off topic? Daniel16544 (talk) 20:38, 16 July 2011 (UTC) Okay I understand, thanks. Daniel16544 (talk) 20:47, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

User browser:Nightly
Eh, there's already this template User:Jruderman/Userboxes/FirefoxTrunk, but anyways, since Nightly isn't a standalone browser, you cat and box should probably be moved to under this category. I'll probably do it if you don't mind. --illythr (talk) 20:25, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I would mind. Guess I didn't do a good enough search for this, but I like the one I made better.     ArcAngel    (talk) ) 07:56, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * By "moved" I didn't mean "deleted" - just recategorized to be part of the existing FF group. --illythr (talk) 10:34, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * To be clear, do you mean moving my current one to that category, or replacing what I now have with that category?   ArcAngel    (talk) ) 10:46, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * First option. Actually, nothing will be moved, only the category tree will be adjusted from Browser->Nightly to Browser->Firefox->Nightly. --illythr (talk) 12:26, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, that sounds reasonable. Move away!  :)     ArcAngel    (talk) ) 16:25, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. Sorry about bothering you on such a trivial issue - it seemed rude to do it without alerting the cat's creator and my initial wording should've been more clear. Cheers! --illythr (talk) 22:17, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * No worries. We got it worked out, and that's all that matters.  :)     ArcAngel    (talk) ) 13:42, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Bells (band)
An AFD has been opened on Bells (band), you might want to weigh in with your opinion.--RadioFan (talk) 17:35, 25 July 2011 (UTC)