User talk:ArcaneRover

April 2024
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 15:18, 8 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi MrOllie,
 * Thanks for your feedback. Could you please elaborate on which sources were deemed unreliable? The selection of sources I used provided objective information on the history of machine translations. I avoided subjective point of views on the subject and was merely adding to the historical perspective, which by definition is verifiable. ArcaneRover (talk) 16:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Self published sources, including vendor sites such as translationagency.com, are not usable on Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 16:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay thank you for the clarity I will keep that in mind for the future. ArcaneRover (talk) 16:09, 8 April 2024 (UTC)