User talk:Arcann

Weclome to my talk page

Parallel computing
Hi! I've noticed that you've made some large contributions to the article Parallel computing. There is presently a discussion on restructuring various articles on concurrency and parallel computing taking place at Talk:Concurrent programming language, and I thought you might want to make your views known.

There is also some talk of starting a Concurrency Wikiproject to coordinate efforts on taming the structure and content of the diverse articles on concurrency and parallel computing. Would you be interested in contributing to this effort?

--Allan McInnes 17:17, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Blog software


The article Blog software has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Small stub unlikely to grow, provides no real value.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thargor Orlando (talk) 12:37, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

"Row(database)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Row(database)&redirect=no Row(database)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:29, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Null (SQL)
Null (SQL) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)