User talk:Archduk3

Copyright problem: Vanguard School (Illinois)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Vanguard School (Illinois), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://vanguard.d214.org/director_message.aspx, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Vanguard School (Illinois) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Vanguard School (Illinois), in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Vanguard School (Illinois) with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Vanguard School (Illinois). See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Vanguard School (Illinois) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

March 2012
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Star Trek canon. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 16:36, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Edit war problem.
Archduk3: It looks like you are involved in something of an edit war at Star Trek canon. Instead of forcing other people to accept your personal preferred version of an article by repeatedly reverting them, please try to discuss the matter and get people to agree with you first, or try to work out a compromise, on the article talk page. Thanks! -- Jayron  32  18:26, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * FWIW, Archduk did start a conversation at the Talk page a few days back, though the edit-warring on his and another editor's parts continued. Given the circumstances I gave both an edit warring advisory and suggested at the article's Talk page that they leave further edits to the disputed sections of the article to other editors at least until a consensus emerges. Doniago (talk) 19:50, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Shonuff, but the idea is to finish the conversation at the talk page before editing again, not merely to start it. -- Jayron  32  19:52, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * If the other party can't be bother to join a discussion, I consider it finished enough to make changes, and I'm offended that starting that discussion is still considered "forcing other people to accept [my] personal preferred version of an article" when I'm the only one involved that bothered to explain the reasons for my edits. One would think that reverting something time and again with only enough explanation that can fit in the edit summary would be forcing a personal preference, but then again, apparently I'm not enough of a person around here for my opinions to count. To think that MA is accused of driving away editors, when you fine folks just outright say that new and niche editors need not apply. - Archduk3 (talk) 18:49, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * That you started a discussion on the Talk page does not mean you're in the clear to continue reverting another editor's changes to the article repeatedly. That is still considered to be edit warring. The proper course of action would be to warn them for edit-warring, which I was forced to do in your stead, and if necessary report them at WP:AN3, not turn editing the article into a ping pong match. Thank you for your understanding. Doniago (talk) 16:27, 5 March 2012 (UTC)