User talk:Archer Rafferty

Welcome!
Hello, Archer Rafferty, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 19:07, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. And the edit summary as well. Drmies (talk) 19:09, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Not my problem the majority of your editing staff can't properly manage an article without their immature political positions blocking whatever little talent they have. User:Archer Rafferty (talk)
 * Wikipedia does not work that way. There is no "editing staff". The rest is insult, including that stuff you removed (and "trigger", that's immature), and if you use that language again I will topic-ban you from the Donald Trump article, hoping that this will improve the editing atmosphere in the article and on the talk page. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 05:45, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, you're going to have to specific exactly what "language" I used that apparently broke your rules or what you are attempting to convey won't fully break through. By your logic, calling me immature would break the rules you're currently enforcing. Food for thought Ms. Admin. User:Archer Rafferty (talk)
 * I didn't call you immature. Please read our policies, and my words, more carefully. Drmies (talk) 20:44, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Donald Trump infobox
Hi there. You previously participated in a previous conversation about the best way to reflect Donald Trump's business career in his infobox. You might be interested in an active RfC on this topic. Edge3 (talk) 03:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at /r/The Donald. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a blockage. Thank you. That man from Nantucket (talk) 21:23, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Nantucket your source is flawed with zero evidence to back up your claims that /r/The_Donald is racist, I'm completely justified in my undoing of your edit. If you continue this I'm going to call in moderation. Archer Rafferty (talk) 21:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. That man from Nantucket (talk) 21:48, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Someguy1221 (talk) 22:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)