User talk:Archives Coll

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:


 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ksmiletris.png|23px]]  Introduction
 * 5     The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * [[Image:Crystal package utilities.png|23px]]  How to edit a page
 * [[Image:Crystal khelpcenter.png|23px]]  Help
 * Crystal Clear app ktip.svg  Tips
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ksokoban.png|23px|]]  How to write a great article
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app kedit.svg|23px]]  Simplified Manual of Style
 * [[Image:Nuvola apps konquest.svg|23px]]  Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Abductive (reasoning) 20:38, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Paul Ré and Paul Bartlett Ré Peace Prize
Hi, Archives Coll, I restored the article issues tags to the above articles because they seem reasonable and appropriate. You said in your edit summaries that you were removing the tags because the material is based on "primary sources". Unfortunately, this is not acceptable sourcing for Wikipedia articles. Please review our policy on original research, which explains that Wikipedia articles should "be based on reliable, published secondary sources and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources." Please see the primary source section of the policy for more information as it explains that primary sources should only be used in a limited and careful way and that articles should not be based on them. I am also concerned about the general content and writing style of these articles. They do not read as neutral or encyclopedic in tone. Wikipedia is a project to build an encyclopedia and thus articles need to be encyclopedic in tone and written from a neutral point of view. If you are the article subject, his employee, representative, etc, please be aware that Wikipedia strongly discourages people from writing about themselves, their work, employers, and other subjects with which they have a close association. Please see the Conflict of Interest and Autobiography guidelines for more information. The biography, in particular, needs a lot of work in order to bring it into line with Wikipedia's policies and I am not convinced that the "Peace Prize" article even qualifies for a separate article. The identified article issues need to be dealt with if these articles are to remain on Wikipedia. Sarah 14:03, 7 March 2013 (UTC)