User talk:Archyboy34

Speedy deletion nomination of Tx81
Hello Archyboy34,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tx81 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, → Σ σ  ς. 02:46, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jamie john archer


A tag has been placed on Jamie john archer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:54, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Jamie john archer. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 02:56, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Llanwrtyd Wells has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Llanwrtyd Wells was changed by Archyboy34 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.917277 on 2017-11-14T21:41:49+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Llanwrtyd Wells. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hummerrocket  (talk)  21:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 22:22, 14 November 2017 (UTC)