User talk:Arconada

Response to Karen Alexander (singer)
That line I removed is POV, because it looks like someone is describing how the album sounds, and it looks like someone is comparing the two albums. I agree, it should be re-phrased, but it also needs a source to avoid original research.

I have never heard of Karen Alexander until recently, as I've been going through the "American female singers" category. Sadly, if no sources are found about this lady, then the page might have to be deleted. I will, however, gladly look for some sources about her first. :) Acalamari 18:28, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, you've done a good job finding sources for Karen Alexander and establishing notability. What you've written doesn't seem POV anymore, as you've sourced the page. I'll see if I can do some improvements to the page as well. Good work. :) Acalamari 16:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Arconada 17:25, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Mach 5 photo
What does "level" mean when you posted that as the edit summary for some kind of change to the Mach 5 photo? Doczilla STOMP! 04:59, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

I changed the level, or gamma, exposure or lightness of the picture, or whatever the usual name is. Compare http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/archive/1/13/20080504231035%21Mach5_Comic-Con2007.JPG

with http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/13/Mach5_Comic-Con2007.JPG.

Maybe you will have to refresh the picture in you browser cache (ctrl F5 in IE) to see the result. Regards, Arconada (talk) 07:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Goering giving a speech to his fighter pilots near Calais September 1940.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Goering giving a speech to his fighter pilots near Calais September 1940.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Karen Alexander - Voyager.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Karen Alexander - Voyager.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 21:37, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Karen_Alexander_-_Voyager.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Karen_Alexander_-_Voyager.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 08:57, 15 January 2009 (UTC)