User talk:Ardbia

Welcome!
Hello, Ardbia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Michael O'Flaherty
You added a long quotation to the Michael O'Flaherty article (without providing an edit summary, so it's not clear why you did), and your edit was reverted, by me, with the rationale that the quote did not add to the understanding of the subject. Again, without edit summary explaining why, you restored the quote. First, I will point out that Wikipedia has a rule of collaboration called bold, revert, discuss. You boldly edited the article. Excellent! I disagreed and reverted your addition, providing my rationale as my edit summary. Your next step should have been to discuss the change in order to build consensus for it. You didn't do that, but OK, we're now at the discussion phase anyway. I'd like to ask you what this quote adds to the article? It is a long quote describing O'Flaherty's own opinions about his work. The quote does not clarify the work that O'Flaherty did, nor does it clarify the impact of the work, it merely presents his own views of the work. To my mind, it does not add to the article at all. I'd like to hear your views on why you feel that it does. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:43, 20 July 2015 (UTC)