User talk:Arderich

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

May 2015
Hello, I'm Doniago. I wanted to let you know that I undid your recent edits to the The Rage: Carrie 2 plot summary because they added a significant amount of unneeded detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 14:43, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Carrie (novel), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 15:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Soylent Green plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unneeded detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 19:09, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

It is important to tell that Simonson was murdered, because Soylent feared, he might talk.Arderich (talk) 14:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Absence of Malice (film)
You're coming up on 3 reverts on the issue of Rosen being "prosecuted". You should point to a spot in the script where it shows he's going to be prosecuted, or you risk being accused of edit warring. For your use, here's the section of the script where you should be looking for a reference to support your POV:
 * Rosen - That's really too bad. I'm sorry. He's a nice guy.
 * Wells - He just forgot about the rules. What will you do after government service?
 * Rosen - I'm not quitting.
 * Wells - You ain't no presidential appointee. The one that hired you was me. You got thirty days.

You should also check the section on edit warring. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_warring

Wells says "I´m going to have someone´s ass in my briefcase" at the beginning of the inquiry. He meant he is going to prosecute someone for this to make sure it will not happen again on the orders of the department. When he did put Rosen´s investigation file in his briefcase after everything was over and looked furious at Rosen, he told him he will be the one who will be prosecuted for what has happened, because everything was his fault. Additionally he fires him on the spot to make sure such leakage will not happen again, as he promised he would. Arderich (talk) 14:30, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

I've removed the "and prosecutes" once again. While this discussion really belongs on the article talk page, you're not responding there and are instead doing it on my personal talk page. You should review the following articles: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research Please state (on the article talk page, not on either of our personal pages) where a reliable published source for your contention that Rosen is prosecuted can be found. Zooks527 (talk) 13:52, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of JL-3


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on JL-3 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Adem20 (talk) 12:38, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at Outbreak (film). You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 21:54, 2 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The same goes for The Caine Mutiny (film). Plot sections must be straight-forward descriptions of the action of the film, and cannot contain analysis or interpretation. Your edits deal with the motivation of the characters, which is not allowed. Please do not restore these edits again. Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:10, 20 February 2017 (UTC)