User talk:Ardfern/Archive6

2010 Archive

Medicinernes Skiklub Svartor
Hello. I am contacting you because you are listed as a participant for WikiProject Norway, and the above-mentioned article is sourced by all Norwegian-language references. Moreover, the references do not appear to support notability; they might be mere trivial references to the subject. Since these sources are all offline, and I do not speak or read Norwegian, I'm hoping whether you can assist me in determining whether the article qualifies for speedy deletion. Many thanks! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 13:00, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Tobermore Picture
Thanks for the picture, don't know whether its coincidence or you read my "to do list" on the articles discussion page, but the article needs more pictures and thanks for obliging! Bright Ruler (talk) 16:13, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Comores Aviation
It seems someone messed up the informations you added a few years ago (Destinations), you might want to check it. Plushy (talk) 14:10, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 1360 in Ireland


The article 1360 in Ireland has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non notable. Virtual nothing in article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 06:31, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:29, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

A-Class opinion needed for British Airways page
I've been doing a lot of work on the British Airways page since June 5 2010 to get the page to A-Class from GA-Class but I need two uninvolved editors to say yes or no to the change. You seem to have done a lot in this field so I thought you would probably be best qualified to help me with this. You don't have to do it right away but a quick response would be helpful. The review page is here and I've done all the work outlined by SidewinderX (talk) even though it isn't all scored through. Thanks in advance, Plane Person (talk) 19:03, 30 June 2010 (UTC).

Articles for deletion nomination of Alaska Seaplane Service
I have nominated Alaska Seaplane Service, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Alaska Seaplane Service&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:54, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Inland Aviation Services
I have nominated Inland Aviation Services, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Inland Aviation Services. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:15, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Peatlands Park
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Peatlands Park, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.peatlandsni.gov.uk/education/about.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:23, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Copyright block
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating copyright policy by copying text into Wikipedia from sources. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, yet you've still continued to do it, most recently with Peatlands Park (created today) and Ballypatrick Forest (created yesterday). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to quote non-free text. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Theleftorium (talk) 22:06, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Copyright investigation
Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. Theleftorium (talk) 09:38, 15 August 2010 (UTC)


 * As a long time contributor, I was very distressed at this block and investigation. I have written hundreds of articles over the last five years, largely in the same style and all carefully referenced and attributed. Apart from the plagiarism you mentioned (on a minor article in 2005 when I had only started making contributions) I have never had any adverse comments from administrators or queries raised over plagiarism or copyright. I am perfectly happy to go back over all articles I contributed and review and change them as necessary, if you could give advice on what exactly is being done incorrectly and guidance on how it should be corrected. I would be happy for you to take, for instance, the apparently offending Ballypatrick Forest article and show me how in fact it should be written to avoid copyright violation. I genuinely do want to understand how articles should be written to avoid copyright violation and at the same time ensure that they are properly referenced and thus attributed. In view of my willingness to correct all faults in all articles I have contributed, I would ask for the block to be removed (subject to the appropriate advice and guidance requested above).Ardfern (talk) 19:46, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Ardfern. First of all, thank you for wanting to improve yourself and fix your mistakes. That is much appreciated. In response to your comment about never having had any queries raised over plagiarism or copyright: You have previously been notified of the copyright policy at User_talk:Ardfern/Archive3, User_talk:Ardfern (an admin even removed the copyright violation from the article), and User_talk:Ardfern (although not directed at you, it clearly stated that "For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images.") I will explain some of my concerns below, but I strongly advise you to read WP:Plagiarism and WP:Copyrights before then. Theleftorium (talk) 19:56, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

As you suggested, let's take Ballypatrick Forest as an example. The source says:

The article says:

Do you see the problem here? The entire paragraph has been copied almost verbatim from the source, and almost no efforts have been made to paraphrase it. By copying text like this without paraphrasing, you are violating our policies and the US copyright law. The article Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches contains some suggestions for paraphrasing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism". This source is also helpful. Theleftorium (talk) 20:17, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Read all the advice you suggested and completely understand the issue here. Your advice and explanation are very clear and very helpful. I will be very much more careful in future and will ensure no re-occurrence. I am happy to go back now to revise earlier articles including Ballypatrick Forest, Peatlands park etc should you decide to remove the block. many thanks for the constructive and helpful approach.Ardfern (talk) 20:30, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I have unblocked your account. When you rewrite an article, make sure that you follow the instructions on the template that was placed over it. I or another editor will take a look at your rewrite before moving it to the namespace. If there are any further issues, I'll do my best to explain them to you. :) Theleftorium (talk) 20:38, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Many thanks. I have also been looking at Good Articles for inspiration. I won't let you down. Ardfern (talk) 20:43, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * By the way, keep in mind that paraphrasing can be difficult at first, and may take some time to learn. Don't be discouraged if your first attempts still contain some problems. Regards, Theleftorium (talk) 20:46, 15 August 2010 (UTC)


 * The requested copyright investigation is now open at Contributor copyright investigations/Ardfern. You are not only welcome, but encouraged to clean any problems that are identified. If you are interested in doing so, please keep an eye on that page and its subpages, as you will not be notified of issues found in that content. We have quite a backlog at CCI, so there are good odds that this investigation will be open for some time before completion. My past experience suggests that you might expect flurries of activity followed by long periods of dormancy. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:05, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Images of pictures
Hi. I have started a discussion on images of pictures at Talk:Provisional Irish Republican Army. It's nothing personal, just an old hobby-horse of mine. Regards, Scolaire (talk) 07:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Cork city cats
Hi. Given the absence of an edit summary it's not clear why you removed all but one cat here. Can you help me understand the rationale? Particularly concerned that Category:Cities in the Republic of Ireland is down one (quite obvious) member. As is Category:Towns and villages in County Cork, Category:County towns in the Republic of Ireland, etc. If the rationale is that the Cork cat is a subcat of these cats, then I would point you to WP:EPON - which states:
 * an article should not be excluded from any set category on the grounds that its eponymous category is made a "subcategory" of that category

Cheers. Guliolopez (talk) 22:21, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Happy to change back. Ardfern (talk) 09:48, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Goa vs Vasco da gama
Hi, could you please have a look on Talk:SpiceJet destinations and leave you expert opinion for this controversial changes. Thanks. never stop flying (talk) 01:26, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Airline articles without any sources
Hi Ardfern, I'm currently working on adding sources to airline articles that are totally lacking them so far. During editing, I noticed that you created quite a few such articles in 2005, some of which are still unreferenced. Would you mind stating your souces? I've made a list of the airline articles in question here. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 11:57, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Athena Air Services


The article Athena Air Services has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * tagged as hoax; please provide reliable source evidence that this airline exists or existed

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 19:19, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Air Vardar for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Air Vardar, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Air Vardar until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 00:16, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Astravia–Bissau Air Transports for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Astravia–Bissau Air Transports, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Astravia–Bissau Air Transports (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 08:58, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Amberair for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Amberair, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Amberair until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 11:52, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Air Comores International for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Air Comores International, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Air Comores International until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Nomination of Air Florida Airlines for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Air Florida Airlines, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Air Florida Airlines until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 11:09, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Air Cordial for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Air Cordial, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Air Cordial until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 06:55, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Haitair for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Haitair, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Haitair until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 07:18, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Caribbean Pearl Airways for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Caribbean Pearl Airways, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Haitair until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 07:25, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Air Horizon Afrique for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Air Horizon Afrique, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Air Horizon Afrique until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 10:46, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Easy Air for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Easy Air, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Easy Air until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 10:42, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Peace Air (Sri Lanka)


A tag has been placed on Peace Air (Sri Lanka) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 10:47, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lankair


A tag has been placed on Lankair requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 11:13, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Macau Asia Express for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Macau Asia Express, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Macau Asia Express until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 09:41, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Air Dravida for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Air Dravida, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Air Dravida until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 09:51, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Air Kharkiv for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Air Kharkiv, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Air Kharkiv until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Nomination of Ciel Airlines for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Ciel Airlines, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ciel Airlines until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 09:19, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Arabjet for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Arabjet, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Arabjet until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 09:30, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Airlink Zambia for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Airlink Zambia, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Airlink Zambia until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Nomination of Flyington Freighters for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Flyington Freighters, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Flyington Freighters until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 10:38, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of RivieraJet for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article RivieraJet, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/RivieraJet until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 13:23, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

FOS Logistics
Hello,

I've been going through the Cyprus Airline templates. A couple of years ago, you created a stub of FOS Logistics. I haven't really been able to find anything concrete on the company and the link to the website provided is dead. Did this airline ever really fly of was it just planned, as e.g. suggests. Travelbird (talk) 17:09, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Pluto Airlines for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Pluto Airlines, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pluto Airlines until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 10:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Air Miles (charter broker) for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Air Miles (charter broker), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Air Miles (charter broker) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 10:55, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Caribbean Air Systems for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Caribbean Air Systems, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Caribbean Air Systems until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 11:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Bosnia Airlines for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Bosnia Airlines, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bosnia Airlines until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

'''Ardfern, sorry for having littered your talk page with all those deletion notices that I added over the past weeks. I was just hunting down failed or (in my opinion) un-notable airlines, and your name often showed as initial editor.''' Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 11:37, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Dsiputed notability for Aerowings
Hi Ardfern, I've just added some basic sources to an article which you created back in 2005, and had been PRODed. Still, I think the airline might not be notable at all, as it was extremely short-lived. Maybe you want to improve the article by adding reliable sources so that is passes WP:CORP? Please not that the matter is also discussed here. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 15:08, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Aero Business Charter for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Aero Business Charter, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aero Business Charter until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 11:49, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Comfort Air for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Comfort Air, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Comfort Air until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Nomination of Rheinair for deletion
The article Rheinair is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rheinair until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 11:21, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Great PopMart photos!
I left this message on your Commons account, but I'm not sure if you saw it or not. I really thought your PopMart photos were superb! I'm so glad you added them, it was just what we needed for the PopMart Tour article. I was wondering if you had any photos from the Zoo TV Tour that you would be willing to upload, as Zoo TV Tour is really in need of a clear picture of the stage/set. Thanks! Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk &bull; contributions) 02:11, 31 December 2010 (UTC)