User talk:Areimold/Personal Sandbox

The beginning of the article seems like it's written more like an essay instead of a Wikipedia page. Aside from some formatting stuff, this is a pretty solid job. Nice work, Reimold. Roverzorz (talk) 19:51, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Great article! I never heard nor read The Radicalism of the American Revolution by Gordon S. Wood. From reading this article it makes me want to read the book and explore other works by Gordon S. Wood. Christasia Wilson (talk) 04:28, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

I thought the article was very interesting. The categorization was done pretty well and the analysis was on point. I thought that the references were geared too much towards the bottom of the page. I also thought that some of the topics brought up were a little broad but that could just be the way they were discussed in the book. Anyway the article was well organized and written especially for a work in progress.Tuc09652 (talk) 21:59, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

I enjoyed the layout of the page. The things that I would like to see developed more are the ideas that you started off saying: systems of patricians and plebians, patriarchal dependence, and patronage. If you could go further into detail as to what these ideas entail I think that the whole page would be relatively complete. Also, when you say that holding office holds no salivary, did you mean salary? And I'm going to be that guy and correct the spelling of 'divine write' later in that paragraph. Should be right. Good wikipage! 155.247.166.29 (talk) 07:51, 2 December 2011 (UTC)