User talk:Areszorra

What is Biased?
Hi Chris, as for my reason to take off the signs, i believe that it is not vandalism. When I checked out your page(which was really cool), I found out that you were a "Japanophile" and "Believe that Taiwan is a Legitimate Country", that is the sign of biased. Obviously, when looking at the Sino-Japanese war page, you feel that the article is written "unfairly" or with a biased "tone" against Japan. However, it is the truth that is presented. You should realize how Japan had committed these atrocities. It is only fair and justifiable for these things to be mentioned. As for the "tone" and the "faireness" of the article, there should be one. History is written by the victors. Japan still denies the Rape of Nanjing and denies to do what the German president did(Kowtow). I would love to chat with you. Areszorra (talk) 22:44, 29 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Two things. Those tags are there because someone has concerns. Not me. Once those concerns are met, by an editor who has no stake in either side, or an admin, then those tags will be removed. If their concern is not addressed, the tags should stay until they are. That "history is written by the victors" is true, that doesn't make the history itself true. In my schooling we were taught "America were the good guys in World War II". We didn't learn about the Japanese-American internment camps or the firebombing of Dresden, or countless other incidents of victor's justice. It's the history of the victors, but one-sided.


 * Second, when you edit, you should leave an edit summary. That way other editors know why you made the change you did, so you don't look like a vandal.


 * Good luck and enjoy Wikipedia! --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 02:04, 30 April 2010 (UTC)