User talk:Arey051012

Proposed deletion of Kamikaze sperm
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kamikaze sperm, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? NuclearWarfare (talk) 03:57, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Mexico's earliest human occupation
Hi there Arey. You were right of course to alter the statement in Mexico and History of Mexico articles about the 40,000-year old "footprints" as based on flawed analysis, although that date was never seriously accepted by researchers and it was only ever a v. small minority in favour. However, the 23,000 BC date the Encarta mentions (presumably referring to some dates from the Tlapacoya site) is not one that is widely accepted either, and so I would not describe it as an 'earliest confirmed date'. Confirmed dates (ie ones which everyone is comfortable with) for Mesoamerica & Mexico are no earlier than ca. 9000-11000 years ago. There are several dating results that have been sporadically reported, such as the Tlapocaya one, of 20,000 and more years ago; but these are seen by most to be problematic and unsafe results. --cjllw ʘ  TALK 14:08, 25 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for clearing up that information. I'm new to Wiki, it'll take me a while to get used to things around here. :)
 * By the way, what should I press to reply to your statement? Did I do it correctly? Arey051012 (talk) 16:56, 25 June 2008 (UTC)


 * No problems, the matter of earliest human occupation of the Americas is generally a complicated and often contentious one, and there are suprisingly few sources that give a thorough consideration of the full picture. The Encarta entry doesn't do it all that much justice, and neither does wikipedia (yet).
 * And yes, replying like you did (on the same talk page under the comment) is fine. Most people leaving you a comment or question on your talk page would follow up later to see if you've responded. If you want to let them know for sure, you can reply on their user talk page, which will make the "you have new messages" infobar pop up for them the next time they access something on wikipedia while logged in. Above I've put one of the standard 'welcome message' templates, it contains some links to editing tips and resources that users new to wikipedia often find helpful. But if you're unsure about something, don't hesitate to ask someone on a talk page or discussion board; most folks will be only too happy to try and help out. All the best, --cjllw  ʘ  TALK 00:21, 26 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks so much! I think I'm going to like it here. Arey051012 (talk) 03:45, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * you're most welcome! See you round, --cjllw ʘ  TALK 07:32, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Monsignor João S. Antão School No. 31
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Monsignor João S. Antão School No. 31, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.elizabeth.k12.nj.us/schools/31/Home.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:11, 28 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Didn't know this wasn't allowed. I'll change it. Arey051012 (talk) 16:10, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Songsforsilentmovies.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Songsforsilentmovies.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Elements of Moral Philosophy


The article The Elements of Moral Philosophy has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence of notability, fails WP:GNG. No inline sources and a quick online search found no significant coverage."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 10:18, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of The Elements of Moral Philosophy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Elements of Moral Philosophy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Elements of Moral Philosophy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 15:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC)