User talk:Areyoucorrupt?explain

Explain..
Hello there This article is not spam is just a talking investigation (everything you may post it will be treated into a local newspaper and blog). The article is not to damage the wikipedia image just to find out about user rights. Everything started from an user mistake and the things are unexplained when is come to post a description. We've seen on wikipedia this article about istock where from description suggested to us, as being a promotional article. Why in the next case if an user is copying and paste a description from istock is banned with the reason of "promotional". Istock text : "iStock is

an online, royalty free, international microstock photography provider operating with the micropayment business model. iStock offers millions of

photos, illustrations, clip art, videos and audio tracks. Images cost between 1 and 150 credits, depending on size and image collection (with credits

ranging from $0.95 to $1.50 USD [1] each)."

If I'm changing the name of istock into Areyoucorupt? - am I having the same rights as istock or the account is getting banned with the reason of "promotional". Look forward to hear from your Editors. Areyoucorrupt?explain (talk) 16:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)]