User talk:Arfan2006

List
Hi Arfan, thanks for letting me know about the deletion. So far, it looks as though it'll be kept, though you might want to go back and vote yourself, as I saw you'd left a comment but not a vote. If you're interested in editing other animal rights pages, the category is Category:Animal liberation movement (which I'm going to ask to have moved to animal rights). There's a list of our AR articles there, and if you write one yourself, be sure to add the category to the page. The pages that come under attack most often are Animal testing and Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty. Animal testing usually has several anon IPs editing on the pro-testing side. One of them at the moment resolves to the Research Defence Society. A new editor has recently arrived on the page called User:Rockpocket, a former vivisectionist, but reasonable and prepared to be more or less neutral. If you're interested in joining in, you'd be very welcome. See Talk:Animal testing. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk) 21:09, 6 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I see now that you did go back and leave a vote. SlimVirgin (talk) 21:48, 6 January 2006 (UTC)


 * A vote is where you say "Keep" in bold? Arfan2006 21:50, 6 January 2006 (UTC)


 * That's right. SlimVirgin (talk) 22:02, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

List of lab animal suppliers
I've moved it to the new title as requested. SlimVirgin (talk) 00:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Changing the name seems to have lost the deletion discussion page - is there a way of manually changing this to the old one? Arfan2006 10:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Consort Kennels
Consort Kennels, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Consort Kennels satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Consort Kennels and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Consort Kennels during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guy (Help!) 23:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Regal Rabbits
Regal Rabbits, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Regal Rabbits satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Regal Rabbits and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Regal Rabbits during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guy (Help!) 23:35, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of abattoirs in the UK
List of abattoirs in the UK, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of abattoirs in the UK satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/List of abattoirs in the UK and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of List of abattoirs in the UK during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guy (Help!) 23:39, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Oxford University Park Farm
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Oxford University Park Farm, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of the page. Rockpock e  t  01:56, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Harlan (company)
A tag has been placed on Harlan (company) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Tim Pierce (talk) 14:55, 19 October 2010 (UTC)