User talk:Argentine Republic

Mark Botsford
Hello! Will you be adding any information to the Mark Botsford article, beside the list of links? —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:46, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark Botsford


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Mark Botsford requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. AllyD (talk) 20:19, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Mark Botsford moved to Draft:Mark Botsford
Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia. Unfortunately, this may not be strong enough a topic for an article. I've moved it to Draft space so that you can add content and sourcing so as to ready it for a return to Article space. Please help us by improving this thusly:
 * Articles require
 * significant coverage
 * in reliable sources
 * that are independent of the subject.


 * Significant coverage
 * We need references that discuss the subject – directly, in detail. Not just passing mentions, directory listings, or any old thing that happens to have the name in it. And we need several references - not just one. These sources show that the subject is notable.
 * Reliable sources 
 * We need sources generally trusted to tell the truth. Major newspapers. Factual, widely-published books. Or other high-quality mainstream publications which are careful about fact-checking and accuracy. Not: forums, fansites, MySpace, Facebook, or most blogs. Good sources make the text verifiable.
 * Independent
 * Nothing written by the subject or paid for by the subject. Not their website. Not a press release. Primary sources aren't enough: we require something independent.

A useful search tool--Wikipedia Reference Search Dloh cierekim  00:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Mark Botsford
Draft:Mark Botsford, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Mark Botsford and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Mark Botsford during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:22, 20 December 2015 (UTC)