User talk:ArgentiumOutlaw

==Archives== I didn't really need to, but I felt like cleaning up, so I archived a bunch of older stuff that has been resolved and etc...


 * User talk:ArgentiumOutlaw/Archive01
 * User talk:ArgentiumOutlaw/Archive02

Useful Links/Templates/Info

 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

All that is needed is to enter at the top of the page, which then makes an automatic link to the disambig page - hope this helps! MPF 13:30, 8 December 2005 (UTC)


 * for disambiguation link on a page.
 * for a voice acting stub (alter for different stubs).
 * [[Image:Arbutus.JPG|thumb|267px|Screen shot of Arbutus from "Garden of Evil".]] for images.
 * #Redirect redirect page
 * [[Image:Arbutus.JPG|thumb|267px|Screen shot of Arbutus from "Garden of Evil".]] for images.
 * #Redirect redirect page
 * #Redirect redirect page

by: ArgentiumOutlaw

Lost mediation

 * I too would like to offer my thanks for your participation in the mediation. It's my hope that we'll now all be able to put our differences behind us, and work together towards our common goal of providing high-quality Lost articles on Wikipedia.  And I'm excitedly looking forward to our having a front page featured article on Monday!  :) --Elonka 21:13, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I thank you for the gesture, and I also thank you for trying hard to get us passed this hurdle we've finally cleared. Hopefully both groups can now put together their efforts into a single area. ArgentiumOutlaw 01:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Eye of Ra
I commend your expertise in drawing the Ancient Egyptian symbol. Its proportions seem to be the most suitable out of all depictions available on the free and open Internet. You could copyright it, but that would be like suggesting that the alphabet of a language is owned by some mortal.

-- Lindberg 16:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Arbutus (Aladdin)
Arbutus (Aladdin), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Arbutus (Aladdin) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Arbutus (Aladdin) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Arbutus (Aladdin) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. shoy (words words) 22:09, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Arbutus.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Arbutus.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Lasardo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Lasardo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 14:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bangzoom.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bangzoom.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pete Stacker
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pete Stacker, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rtphokie (talk) 11:53, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Bookofrage.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bookofrage.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello ArgentiumOutlaw! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:30, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Robert LaSardo -

Proposed deletion of David Scully (actor)


The article David Scully (actor) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced BLP, tagged for over 3 years, with no improvement

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ron h jones (Talk) 01:40, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Cowbell black.png
Thank you for uploading File:Cowbell black.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 11:45, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Lost uv map.png


The file File:Lost uv map.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 19:24, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Iraheffler.JPG


The file File:Iraheffler.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Belle Reve


The article Belle Reve has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "How is this comic book location notable? Sources are the usual PRMARY for PLOT, plus list of appearances in media. Nothing here seems sufficient to warrant a stand-alone article?"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:35, 20 December 2019 (UTC)