User talk:Ari in Jericho

Welcome...

Hello, Ari in Jericho, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! CWC 08:58, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Date Format
Please be aware of the date formatting guidelines for Wikipedia at WP:MOS or WP:ERA. The numerical year should be separated from the era by only a single non-breaking space, often added to the page using "&amp;nbsp;", so 400 BCE will usually look like 400&amp;nbsp;BCE in the page's markup, but will look like 400 BCE on the page. The reason for doing this is to prevent the year and era from being separated from each other during a line-wrap (where the year is at the end of one line, and the era is at the beginning of the next). I hope this was helpful. :) — al-Shimoni  (talk) 02:42, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

April 2013
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:12, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=562081418 your edit] to Arsinoe IV of Egypt may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:14, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ], Civil Wars 2.101.420 Despite the custom of strangling prominent prisoners in triumphs [strangling|]when the festivities were at an end, Caesar was pressured to spare Arsinoe and granted

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=573765568 your edit] to Christianity in Georgia (country) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:32, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Christianity]], primarily the Georgian Orthodox Church. Of these, around 2% follow the  [Russian Orthodox Church], round 5.9% (almost all of whom are ethnic Armenians) follow the [[

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Ungulate
Ari - thanks for your e-mail about edits to the Ungulate page, however, I am afraid you are mistaken. If you look at the page's edit history, which is here you can see my only edit to that page was on 29 January 2016‎, whereas your additions were on 14 February 2016, so I did not "toss" them. - Arjayay (talk) 16:00, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Gatestone Institute
Numerous articles use the phrase "right-wing" and "anti-Muslim". See wp:NPOV for policy. Please feel free to add to the ongoing discussions on the talk page. Jim1138 (talk) 06:05, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

March 2022
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. –– FormalDude  talk  03:35, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Wondering if stable version is best till the 2 talks are over. It's clearly a contested new addition. Moxy -Maple Leaf (Pantone).svg 03:43, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * My edit was am attempt to introduce the neutral term "discourse" to replace the clearly tendentious "propaganda". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ari in Jericho (talk • contribs) 07:32, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Using "discourse" in this context would be false balance which is a violation of neutrality. Not to mention you're going against the consensus which has formed on the article talk page. –– FormalDude  talk  07:58, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * What consensus? Wikipedia is not a polling effort but an attempt to produce a dynamic encyclopaedia. However,  I believe that there is a consensus in most standard published dictionaries that the term, "propaganda", is negative while "discourse" is neutral. Ari in Jericho (talk) 08:40, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * What consensus? Wikipedia is not a polling effort but an attempt to produce a dynamic encyclopaedia. However,  I believe that there is a consensus in most standard published dictionaries that the term, "propaganda", is negative while "discourse" is neutral. Ari in Jericho (talk) 08:40, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice
–– FormalDude  talk  03:36, 26 March 2022 (UTC)