User talk:Ari sara

Peter Panton
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Peter Panton, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.yesplease.it/eng/Foto1_testo.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:13, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Peter Panton for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Peter Panton, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Peter Panton until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Top Jim (talk) 03:41, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Peter Panton


I've deleted Peter Panton speedily from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

While you posted it under a new name, the concnerns of the discussion were not addressed as there aren't any sources on the person himself.

If you think that all this was done in error, please do not post it again as it was, but create a better draft, say at User:Ari sara/Peter Panton and then talk to. Tikiwont (talk) 13:24, 15 December 2010 (UTC)