User talk:Arided

Hey, this is great, I have a user page now. (Again?) Arided (talk) 23:46, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15
Hi. When you recently edited Peer learning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constructivism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
WingtipvorteX  PTT   ∅  20:03, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rage (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for your kind words. It's refreshing to receive positive feedback! As a partial disclaimer, I should add that I feel rather more competent to judge whether a paper meets MEDRS than to syndicate on exactly where and how MEDRS should apply. Fwiw, I also had a glance at the 'textbook': imo, a POV attempt, endorsed/legitimized by Elsevier, to 'legitimize' CAM academically. —MistyMorn (talk) 11:06, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Fyi, I've posted a query about the article you mentioned in a parallel discussion. A further disclaimer: I've no wish to get involved in the TM debate! —MistyMorn (talk) 18:39, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:16, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

PlanetMath Books Exchange: some available content
Hi. Not sure it is of interest to you, but anyway: about advanced calculus, here is a nice textbook available for free (for non-profit use). Boris Tsirelson (talk) 19:12, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pharmakon (philosophy) (January 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pharmakon (philosophy) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pharmakon_(philosophy) Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SwisterTwister&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pharmakon_(philosophy) reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  20:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * , pharmakon is, IMO, an eminently notable topic. Whether the article made that clear is another matter, and whether it is ready now remains to be seen. Just thought I'd let you know since it is somewhat technical, perhaps--I saw you noted it was an interesting topic, and it is. A related concept, as Arided no doubt knows, is the German Gift. Happy days, and thanks for all your work at AfC, Drmies (talk) 04:02, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pharmakon (philosophy) has been accepted
 Pharmakon (philosophy), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Devopam (talk) 05:22, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Pharmakon_(philosophy) help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Red links in Web annotation
Hi - can I politely request that you not delete red links or unlinked items in the Features table in Web annotation, please? First an anonymous editor removed a lot of the information from the table in 2015, and then you, perhaps based on the fact that there was no longer any information about them, removed most of the red links from the table earlier this year. For comparison purposes it is useful to have this table, and I don't believe our users are best served by deleting rows from the table that don't currently have articles.--greenrd (talk) 21:25, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Fringe Theories Noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 02:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Masturbation. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.''Do not reintroduce controversial material w/o talk page consensus. Thank you.'' Ad Orientem (talk) 03:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your draft article, Draft:Miro (collaborative whiteboard software)


Hello, Arided. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Miro".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Sam Sailor 14:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Effects of meditation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dissociation. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Vipassana movement, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -  Let's talk!  19:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

How To Solve It
Just to let you know know I've replied to your comments from 2017 in talk:How to solve it, where you were concerned about possible original research. Musiconeologist (talk) 23:04, 15 March 2024 (UTC)