User talk:Arielinson

Ways to improve Rose Peltesohn
Hi, I'm SPat. Arielinson, thanks for creating Rose Peltesohn!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. the german book you've referenced should be ok, but it would be helpful to have other reference as well

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. S Pat  talk 01:33, 15 July 2013 (UTC) ---

Thank you SPat. Changes and references added and made.

Arielinson (talk) 08:47, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Picture caption for Rose Peltesohn
Hi! I tried to find out when and where the photo File:Rose Pauline Peltesohn.jpg was taken, but I didn't succeed. Since you uploaded it, you might have an idea about that, and could devise a better caption than just repeating her name. Thanks in advance! Best regards - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 23:54, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Tami Lancut Leibovitz
Hello, Arielinson,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Tami Lancut Leibovitz should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Tami Lancut Leibovitz.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Vexations (talk) 17:24, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest editing
Would you please read or re-read WP:COIEDIT and let me know if you are willing to comply with the guideline? Thanks, Vexations (talk) 10:10, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Vexations, As far as I can tell I fully comply with the guidelines. I disclosed being a paid editor as required. If I'm mistaken and missed anything - please let me know where so I'll be able to fix it. Thanks, Arielinson (talk) 10:56, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * , Not quite: You're still making edits to the page in stead of making suggestions on the talk page, for example. You seem to interpret "strongly discouraged" differently than I do. I think it means "please don't do it". What do you think it means? Vexations (talk) 11:09, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Vexations, I think it means I'm allowed to make edits and it does not come against the guidelines although I'm discouraged to do that as in - it is not recommended. The word forbidden or restricted were not used. Anyways out of respect to you and the work you're doing - I'll stop editing the articles. Please note that I've asked your permission to remove some of the "not in the citation given" you've inserted because the resources I've added are showing facts mentioned in the article. Please let me know your thoughts about this. Thanks. Arielinson (talk) 12:22, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * , I'll review all the tags to make sure they are still applicable. Vexations (talk) 12:48, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Vexations thank you for your review. note that Tag [5] from the BBC says "Leibovitz, who's coached Israeli executives and politicians in the art of etiquette for 30 years" - its supports the words about "business executives and government officials" in the article. Tag [6] is a Hebrew article from Globes says that TLL consult for business executives. It supports the same statement in the article. tag [11] talks about globalization and cultural differences which supports the words in the article "how to take into account different cultures and geographical locations". Thank you again. Arielinson (talk) 13:04, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

On Track Innovations moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, On Track Innovations, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. See also WP:COIEDIT. MarioGom (talk) 23:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Payment terminal. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. — LauritzT (talk) 15:27, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: On Track Innovations has been accepted
 On Track Innovations, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=On_Track_Innovations help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 14:03, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)