User talk:Arifbehapiee

Kelly Clarkson
Your formatting on Kelly Clarkson is improper in many ways; we do not write things as "No. 1" as that is NOT encyclopedic material; it should be written out as "number one" as per the website's MOS on years and numbers, all numbers nine and below should be written out in full stature, as such, all words should be fully written out in non-fan format. Also, song titles receive quotations, which album titles are italized; and be aware of WP:OVERLINK when editing, as you've violated this on several occasions.  livelikemusic  my talk page! 15:58, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Piece by Piece (Kelly Clarkson album), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  livelikemusic  my talk page! 18:00, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Fifth Harmony at the 2015 People's Choice Award.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Fifth Harmony at the 2015 People's Choice Award.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Teemeah 편지 (letter)  10:48, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Reflection (Fifth Harmony album). Consider this your final warning on adding original research to articles.  livelikemusic  my talk page! 00:55, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. S warm  we ♥ our hive  15:11, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Reflection (Fifth Harmony album), you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  livelikemusic  my talk page! 01:19, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Fifth Harmony at the Latin Billboard Awards.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Fifth Harmony at the Latin Billboard Awards.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:27, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Worth It Album Cover.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Worth It Album Cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 06:29, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Reflection (Fifth Harmony album), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Stop it with your addition of original research. You'll end up receiving a long-term, potentially permanent block.''  livelikemusic  my talk page! 16:01, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Repeated addition(s) of unsourced sales
Please do not continue to add unsourced sales statements to the article Reflection (Fifth Harmony album). I've seen that you have been reverted by not only myself, but by and. You must provide reliable sources if adding such statements. If you continue, you may end up being reported and blocked for contributing in this manner. IPadPerson (talk) 19:52, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection.  livelikemusic  my talk page! 21:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Replaceable fair use File:Dinah Jane Hansen.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dinah Jane Hansen.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:16, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Stop.
I've seen that you have re-added the original research back into the articles Reflection (Fifth Harmony album) and Fifth Harmony after you have been reprimanded multiple times by myself and two other users to stop. If you continue, you may be blocked without further warning. Thank you. IPadPerson (talk) 15:45, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

ANI Report
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.  livelikemusic  my talk page! 00:30, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Drmies (talk) 02:06, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
IPadPerson (talk) 10:02, 11 May 2015 (UTC) It has been found that you have been using one or more accounts abusively or have edited logged out to avoid scrutiny. Please review the policy on acceptable alternate accounts. In short, alternate accounts or people to support you should not be used for the purposes of deceiving others into seeing more support for your position. It is not acceptable to use two accounts on the same article, or the same topic area, unless they are publically and plainly disclosed on both your and the other account's userpage.

Your other account(s) have been blocked indefinitely. This is your only warning. If you repeat this behaviour you will blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you. Mike V • Talk 19:54, 11 May 2015 (UTC)