User talk:ArkHyena



Hello, ArkHyena, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
 * Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
 * Check out some of these pages:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode


 * If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, [ ask me on my talk page], or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 12:36, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * heyo, tyy and indeed i am! ArkHyena (talk) 23:38, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @ArkHyena Heyo also. :3 Sorry I didn't receive any Notification from the system of Wikipedia that you replied. Anyways, yeah, I'm a yeen also. :3 Hopefully you are doing okay. IapetusCallistus (talk) 15:34, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
 * oh nice, another yeen!! and yeah, i'm doin alright right now :] ArkHyena (talk) 20:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @ArkHyena alright. It's nice to meet you then IapetusCallistus (talk) 12:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * if you wish, i do have other places of contacts where i'm much more responsive ArkHyena (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @ArkHyena hey there. Sorry I was busy: it's Chinese New Year in Taiwan right now and I attended a funeral (sadly it happened just before the festivities). Sure, let me know your alternative contact(s) if you are okay with that IapetusCallistus (talk) 12:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @ArkHyenaby the way, my Telegram is YeenMage IapetusCallistus (talk) 20:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Regular moon
I reverted your (assumedly mistaken) edit on Regular moon without realising you'd already done so. Please feel free to re-add your minor edits prior to that, and sorry for causing you some extra work! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 19:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Oh, of course, no worries! ArkHyena (talk) 19:35, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Wright Mons
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wright Mons
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wright Mons you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 16:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Hello, thank you! I'm glad that there are people out there interested in Triton and its many, much-underrated traits :) ArkHyena (talk) 21:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wright Mons
The article Wright Mons you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wright Mons for comments about the article, and Talk:Wright Mons/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 02:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cryovolcano
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cryovolcano you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Fritzmann2002 -- Fritzmann2002 (talk) 15:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Regular moon
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Regular moon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pencilsforall -- Pencilsforall (talk) 01:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Regular moon
The article Regular moon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Regular moon and Talk:Regular moon/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pencilsforall -- Pencilsforall (talk) 00:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Regular moon
The article Regular moon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Regular moon for comments about the article, and Talk:Regular moon/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pencilsforall -- Pencilsforall (talk) 00:44, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ruach Planitia
Hello! Your submission of Ruach Planitia at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! B3251 (talk) 23:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Climate of Triton
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Ruach Planitia
RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cryovolcano
The article Cryovolcano you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cryovolcano for comments about the article, and Talk:Cryovolcano/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Fritzmann2002 -- Fritzmann2002 (talk) 14:44, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Copy and paste move
Hello! I've noticed in the recent changes log that you copied from Eagle (Meridiani Planum crater) to Eagle (crater). This is a "cut-and-paste" move and is discouraged. I've requested a history merge for now. I recommend requesting a move at WP:RM/TM instead in such cases. Thank you! ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 08:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)


 * (It's discouraged because of attribution, forgot to say that.) ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 08:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh, my apologies. Good to know! I'll keep that in mind for future moves. ArkHyena (talk) 08:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Infoboxes of Mercurian craters
The infoboxes you have been replacing are not redundant. The ones you have removed included a link to the appropriate quadrangle (Debussy, Eminescu, etc). Please revert the edits or suggest another solution. Jstuby (talk) 18:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Quadrangles can simply be included in the "location" section of the feature on celestial object infoboxes. Regardless, you're correct that I was hasty in my editing and that I should have been more careful; I'll go back and implement that change. ArkHyena (talk) 18:53, 24 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I've been hasty before as well. The way the crater infobox is set up is that a formula reads the coordinates and figures out the quadrangle, so there is no manual adding of the quadrangle.  This works for Mercury anyway.

Your GA nomination of Pharos (crater)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pharos (crater) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cocobb8 -- Cocobb8 (talk) 23:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pharos (crater)
The article Pharos (crater) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pharos (crater) for comments about the article, and Talk:Pharos (crater)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cocobb8 -- Cocobb8 (talk) 16:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi ArkHyena, I noticed this recently promoted GA was running out of time to be eligible for "Did you know", so I nominated the article at Did you know nominations/Pharos. Feel free to participate! –– Formal Dude (talk) 06:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh cool! I hadn't initially thought of going forward with a DYK nom myself, as I assumed there was little an average reader would be interested in about the feature. Hopefully I'm proven wrong, though :) ArkHyena (talk) 19:41, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

the second-awesomest natural satellite
Come, now, you can't just leave it at that and not tell us what the objectively awesomest one is. :) (If I might guess – Titan?) Double sharp (talk) 07:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Spot on, Titan of course! Perhaps a bit cliché, but I find no other moon manages to match its impressively exotic geology, atmosphere, and weather/climate. It's big, has an internal ocean, and gets extra points for being placed snugly in Saturn's awesome moon system. ArkHyena (talk) 23:27, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Titan would be one of my picks for awesomest too. It's just that, due to its etymology, I'd have some trouble not jokingly answering with Callisto. :) Double sharp (talk) 04:08, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Haha, etymological justifications are more than welcome of course. Though, I suppose one could evaluate them from purely etymological grounds, in which case I'd have to answer with Hydra—its PIE root also meant otter! And of course, who could forget Dimorphos's (unfortunately) informal name, Didymoon? ArkHyena (talk) 06:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Incidentally, since I saw you wrote regular moon, and because I find it amusing to ponder classification: would you generally consider Luna a regular satellite? I am inclined to think it stands somewhat apart, because while it wasn't captured, it's also far enough out that its precession is primarily controlled by the Sun. (I also am somewhat in two minds about Iapetus. Though of course, this is more a personal-opinion question, since I suspect the sources are generally in accord that these two are regular.) Double sharp (talk) 03:25, 27 June 2024 (UTC)


 * So this is really fun to answer because "regular moon" seems to be one of those terms where astronomers/planetary scientists have this unspoken shared understanding that it's nebulous and no solid definition really exists internally, but nobody cares enough to improve on it since the problems it causes are small. Kinda like "dwarf planet", heh; I wish I could've addressed this in article, but unfortunately it seems to be one of those vibe-based quirks of astronomy nobody really codifies.
 * But there at least seems to be two "starter" definition based on my interpretation of usage: that "regular moon" is dynamic, i.e. that a regular moon is only a low-e low-i moon; or, that it's original, so that only moons that formed around a planet are regular. And annoyingly, there seems to be a lot of hybridization, so people often call Nereid an "irregular moon" regardless of origin hypotheses.
 * Based on the former, I'd probablly say yes? It's quite far out, but it's still a low-e low-i orbit. Certainly no worse than Hyperion or Iapetus, despite its awesome interactions with Solar tides. On the latter, ofc it'd also be yes, as it seems collisions also count as in-situ formation. So I guess yes in general?? ArkHyena (talk) 03:44, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the very illuminating reply! I likewise wish this could've been addressed too – it's interesting for Phobos and Deimos (and, considering some theories I remember, perhaps Amalthea)? :) Double sharp (talk) 03:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Of course! Phobos and Deimos are weird because they're unequivocally regular moons in the dynamical sense, but due to capture hypotheses they're treated more as a toss-up. MMX should help clear that up (fully expecting an in-situ origin myself!), so that conundrum may not be around by 2030. ArkHyena (talk) 17:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Cool! Now if only we get a Jovian irregular mission at some point. :) Double sharp (talk) 06:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Wait, we very well might get one. Hurray, then! Double sharp (talk) 07:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I really hope this verifies! Knowing how obscure and opaque Chinese interplanetary exploration is, however... (stares at Shensuo and its supposed Quaoar flyby...) ArkHyena (talk) 16:41, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Uranus And Neptune are gas giants
they are gas planets because they have no surface Shallom B Adepoju (talk) 22:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Again, see ice giants page. They are not considered gas giants by scientists. Any further attempts to add the two to the gas giant page will be treated as vandalism. ArkHyena (talk) 22:56, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * ok but can I edit it Shallom B Adepoju (talk) 22:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * thats the only one I can change Shallom B Adepoju (talk) 22:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Redirect the dwarf planet pages Ceres Pluto haumea makemake Eris Quaoar Gonggong Orcus and sedna
change them to 1 Ceres 134340 Pluto 136108 Haumea 136472 Makemake 136199 Eris 50000 Quaoar 225088 Gonggong 90482 Orcus and 90377 Sedna DO IT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Shallom B Adepoju (talk) 23:14, 2 July 2024 (UTC)


 * No. Doing so would require a discussion. There was a requested move recently that demonstrated consensus to name the dwarf planets pages as they are named currently. ArkHyena (talk) 00:45, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * stop it just do it 2601:2C6:500:5300:7D03:B18E:56D:2E29 (talk) 22:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * No. ArkHyena (talk) 23:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks!
Pichpich (talk) 16:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)