User talk:ArkRe

ArkRe (talk) 06:34, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Finally, please forgive the wall of text above. Unfortunately, it appears that formatting is not retained in the unblock template, and I would ideally like to present a better formatted appeal for the sake of readability. It is not my intention to overwhelm reviewing editors with a huge un-formatted chunk of text. ArkRe (talk) 02:02, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for the long wait. Formatted or not, such a lengthy appeal of a block is likely to cause most admins to keep on going and find a simpler case to review. Your explanation and the explanation presented at the SPI on this case are both plausible explanations so this is indeed a tough call. As such I am asking the blocking admin to comment again here. I hate to say this when this has taken so long already, but please be patient as this may take some time to resolve. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:54, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
 * IIRC I was just working from Amalthea's results. He's the one who ran the check so you'd probably want to ping him. I'm also checking with another CU for a second opinion. T. Canens (talk) 01:17, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Purely on the practical level: could you cut your entire unblock rationale, replace it with "See formatted comments below", and paste your comments after the template? I'm sure that you'd get a decline only if your reasoning were seen as invalid; I can't imagine someone refusing to read the rationale and declining with words such as "Four words aren't a good unblock request".  Nyttend (talk) 01:23, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The checkuser I pinged says that he's going to send his results to the functionaries list. It seems that it may take a while to sort everything out. T. Canens (talk) 04:05, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Anyone responding to a future unblock request should probably consult this checkuser report. Bovlb (talk) 06:31, 19 December 2012 (UTC)