User talk:Arkadeep Dey

Welcome to Wikipedia
 Hello, Arkadeep Dey, Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents / Department directory


 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
 * The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Arkadeep Dey, good luck, and have fun. Vengeance 01 (talk) 05:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Kharupetia
Hello, I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. www.census2011.co.in is a copyright website, and therefore it's not okay for you to copy their material to Wikipedia. It looks like a government of India website, but it's not, and even if it were, it would not be okay to copy, because the Government of India copyrights their material as well. All material you add to Wikipedia needs to be written in your own words please. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:23, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Vandalism on Mohun Bagan
Wikipedia is not a platform to show your stupid baseless vandalism. If you have to edit contents, try practicing in sandbox. Consider this as your last and final warning. Another baseless stupid vandalism and you will face the consequences. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IAmPushpak (talk • contribs) 20:13, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Similarly wikipedia is not your platform to remember hypothetical things.. Mohun Bagan is now AtK mohun bagan and that is true... Your baseless warning won't change the fact... Arkadeep Dey (talk) 02:32, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

And about consequences🤣🤣... Do whatever you want kid🤣... Arkadeep Dey (talk) 02:34, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not your platform to experiment. If Mohun Bagan is ATK, you should have come up with proper sources. Instead, what you did was pure vandalism. Having little or no knowledge about wiki, you are using it to edit as per your choice without citing any references. Furthermore, you are degrading an user. Do you have any idea regarding the age of a person that you are referring to as a kid. Some cunts like you are the reason why vandalism exists. If you are so concerned about Indian football, try editing the pages of the club you are a fan of, not the rival club. Such stupid uneducated cultureless fans are starting to edit wiki, expecting it to be some other social media pages. Such a shame !!

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. IAmPushpak (talk • contribs) 01:27, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

🤣🤣do whatever u want kid... Secondly I don't support mohun bagan or east Bengal... So, rivalry angle is quite funny 🤣🤣..

3rdly I've never said mohun vegan is atk... It is named as atk mohun bagan now and I felt necessity to add it there... At least add that it is now known as atk mohun bagan there... And about blocking🤣, do whatever u like... It's not like I'll lose 1000 bucks if wiki blocks me... I can come up another Ac🤣 Arkadeep Dey (talk) 08:33, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 09:41, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Blocked 31 hours, next block will be longer; please note that the issue has already been discussed at length at Talk:Mohun_Bagan_A.C.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:00, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Fran Sota moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Fran Sota, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Ts12rAc talk to me 16:40, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fran Sota


A tag has been placed on Fran Sota requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Saha ❯❯❯  Stay safe    16:16, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Page moves
Please don't move pages to inapplicable namespaces. Francisco José Sota Bernard is neither the talk page of a portal nor a module. I've nominated the leftover redirects from that series of moves for speedy deletion. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 19:16, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. It happened unfortunately. I was trying to find the article option but couldn't and in that hassle it happened.. Arkadeep Dey (talk) 19:35, 28 January 2022 (UTC)


 * @Arkadeep Dey Read the WP:FPL guidlines and policies before moving the article to mainspace. "Players who have not played in a fully professional league listed below may meet Wikipedia's General notability guideline." Fran Sota doesnt have any professional league appearances as of now. You have been warned 3rd time for this. <b style="border:1px solid black"> <b style="color:#FF0000">Saha</b> ❯❯❯ <b style="color:#0043AF"> Stay safe  </b> </b> 13:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Infobox stats
Please note that we only include domestic league games in the infobox - so no Cup or Continental matches etc. Please also ensure that when you update the stats you also update the date, using. If you have any questions please ask. GiantSnowman 17:56, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Hello, I'm Drat8sub. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2023–24 Indian Super League, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

I've addressed the issue at the article talk page. Kindly, visit the article talk page. Drat8sub (talk) 17:01, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Justine Emmanuel
Hello Arkadeep Dey,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Justine Emmanuel for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales Parley 20:57, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Justine Emmanuel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Justine Emmanuel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Justine Emmanuel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. BangJan1999 22:37, 28 January 2024 (UTC)