User talk:ArkadiuszEurope

Proposed deletion of Grzegorz Halama


The article Grzegorz Halama has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No sources or demonstration of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Durova 314 01:30, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Grzegorz Halama


The article Grzegorz Halama has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Empty Buffer (talk) 14:01, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.  Chzz  ► 14:24, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:43, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Boxes
The boxes for your user page are called userboxes. See that page for details; for example;

 Chzz  ► 14:52, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Spójnia Świdwin
A tag has been placed on Spójnia Świdwin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Yousou (talk) 16:56, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

RE: Now my article is good
Please note that you should add a new topic if you want to discuss on a user talk page, not underneath everything because it can look like you are responding to the last topic.

Many Regards, Yousou Yousou (talk) 17:18, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Grzegorz Halama


The article Grzegorz Halama has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.  Chzz  ► 02:33, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Reply - WP:RS
Please see my reply, in User talk:Chzz.  Chzz  ► 08:53, 19 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Now archived, in User talk:Chzz/Archive 24 - but please, don't reply in the archive; if you do have further questions, start a new section on my current talk page instead. Cheers,  Chzz  ► 14:25, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

 * One more thing: When you create an article, please add it to appropriate categories. For example, I did so here. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 23:32, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi. Just add to your User page. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:04, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Tomasz Kupisz
W infoboxie uzupelnia sie tylko statystyki ligowe, a nie puchary. Dopiero jak bedzie gral w polskiej lidze bedzie mozna uzupelnic. Pozdrawiam --marekchelsea (talk) 12:27, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Dobrze zrobiles, ale zawsze jak dodajesz jakas notke do kariery to staraj sie dodawac link (References) ze strony zewnetrznej. pozdrawiam--marekchelsea (talk) 09:17, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Vacant titles
'Vacant' means that, for some reason, there was no current title holder - because they retired undefeated, or some other reason. He did indeed win the title...

The title became vacant May 29 when the WBO stripped lineal champion Sergio Martinez, who had claimed the lineage and two sanctioning organization belts by outpointing Kelly Pavlik on April 17. But because Martinez also holds a junior middleweight belt, and the WBO wanted a decision on which title he would defend before Martinez had made up his mind, he was stripped.

See also here.  Chzz  ► 23:05, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Pomoc w robieniu artykulow i aktualizacji zawodnikow Polskiej 1 ligi(dawnej drugiej) czyli Polish First League
Najpierw sie zapytam wstepnie czy jestes zainteresowany taka robota, ekstraklase juz w zasadzie ukonczylem (praktycznie cala sam aktualizowalem i robilem nowe artykuly), wiec chodzi o 1 lige, jesli sie zgodzisz to wytlumacze dokldnie co mialbys robic. Pozdrawiam. odp--marekchelsea (talk) 20:05, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Sentence
In case you missed my reply - note, it is now in my archive, so see User talk:Chzz/Archive 25 - but please, don't edit there; for any follow-ups, please start a new == Section == on my talk page. Cheers,  Chzz  ► 01:20, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Mikołaj Rudnicki
I know, sorry. I meant to PROD it. ==Proposed deletion of Mikołaj Rudnicki==

The article Mikołaj Rudnicki has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of subject's importance

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Exploding Boy (talk) 17:34, 26 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Not really. The fact that he was a university professor doesn't make him notable, what you've listed as "theses" are in Polish, and they have no links, which suggests they're not notable. Exploding Boy (talk) 17:41, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

RE:Counter-Strike
I have reverted your edits due to violation of WP:GAMEGUIDE I understand that it was not vandalism and it was WP:AGF. Many Regards, Yousou (talk) 18:05, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

I have no presence in the Polish Wikipedia. Whether WP:GAMEGUIDE applies there does not mean it does not count here. Many Regards, Yousou (talk) 18:08, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Yousou (talk) 18:12, 26 August 2010 (UTC) Sleep well. WP:RETIRING Yousou (talk) 18:18, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joanna Bartel


The article Joanna Bartel has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Derild 49  21  ☼  22:00, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Gamecruft
Hello. I'm not American either ;) Generally I'd define gamecruft as something that clutters the article without really adding to it. Under WP:GAMECRUFT in the article guidelines, I'd class it under #6 - "Lists of gameplay items, weapons, or concepts". In Gran Turismo, this could be a list of cars or tracks, in Fight Night Round 4, a list of boxers. Let me know if you've any other questions! Thanks! Fin©™ 18:11, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andreas Kraniotakes


The article Andreas Kraniotakes has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Coolug (talk) 20:30, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Poland/Members activity
Hi. I am conducting another activity check for WikiProject Poland. It seems to me that you are "semi-active". Feel free to change your status here as soon as you make 10 or more edits on Poland-related articles per month! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 19:16, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Francisco Palacios


The article Francisco Palacios has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 01:50, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Monitor. WikiProject Poland Newsletter: Issue 1 (April 2011)
Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:15, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Piotr Wilczewski


The article Piotr Wilczewski has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Calabe1992 (talk) 18:48, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Calabe1992 (talk) 19:11, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Please tag articles as stub
When you create tiny articles like Ostatnia misja, please tag them with appopriate stub templates (like Template:Poland-stub). Also, please add the article to relevant categories, and add talk page wikiproject templates (like Template:WikiProject Poland). Lastly, please make sure that your articles fulfill the WP:N policy; otherwise they may get deleted. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk 23:48, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

inre Articles for deletion/Peter J. Lucas
I very much appreciate your efforts to share Polish notable actors with the Wikipedia community. Quite recently your article on Peter J. Lucas was sent to AFD, pretty much because it did not share much about the individual beyond listing some of his acting projects and because it was not sourced. For BLPs this is a major concern. But rather than it being deleted, it was moved to a User:ArkadiuszEurope workspace at User:ArkadiuszEurope/Peter J. Lucas. I would be willing to assist in improving it.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:39, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michał Milowicz


The article Michał Milowicz has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 22:15, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Peter J. Lucas for deletion/Subsequent Conversation!
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter J. Lucas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Peter J. Lucas (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Zaldax (talk) 01:07, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi there!

I recently saw the message you posted on my talk page about improving the article in question: that's great, I'm glad you've chosen to do so!

Regarding your comment


 * "I will improve this article, because fot you that is too much effort.


 * I don't think like you, i prefer to improve articles than nominate them for deletion."

I must say I'm a little offended - I'm not a deletionist, but maximum discretion applies with a BLP, and seeing as how there was no reliable, secondary source attached and that the article was over a month old I felt it best to nominate it for deletion. I could have applied a CSD A7, or just PROD'ed it, but instead chose to list it as an AFD to give you or another interested editor the chance to save it. It's not that improving the article would be "too much effort" for me, its that Polish actors aren't my area of expertise; I merely encountered the article while patrolling new pages.

In the future, if you plan on improving a new article that may initially not meet Wikipedia standards, consider adding the template "{under construction}" (in proper template format, of course) -- that should inform any editor patrolling new pages of your intent to improve the article in the near future. Anyway, if you comment on the present AFD I'd be happy to move for a procedural close.

P.S. I notice you are from Poland! I actually recently visited Kraków and the nearby UNESCO World Heritage site, the Wieliczka Salt Mine. Yours is a lovely country!

Cheers, Zaldax (talk) 18:37, 8 August 2012 (UTC)


 * I saw the changes made to the article; since you've added reliable sources, I've withdrawn my nomination. Hooray!


 * I'm from the USA, but I was in Central Europe for an extended period of time recently -- Mostly in Prague and the Czech Republic, but also Poland, Austria, Slovakia, and Germany. Sadly, I could only spend a weekend in Poland - I had really wanted to visit the Baltic coast, but I simply didn't have time. I was in Kraków the weekend before the Eurocup, too, so that was certainly an interesting experience! Must admit that I didn't know too much about Polish history before I traveled there, but since my visit my interest is definitely growing. Cheers, Zaldax (talk) 18:49, 8 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Aw, that's unfortunate - it's always sad when a coastal area isn't doing too great. There are similar problems in some areas of the USA; one example I know particularly well is the Chesapeake Bay, just outside of Washington D.C. It's getting better, because of the tourism industry and government/other efforts for conservation, but for the longest time it was pretty near death.


 * Huh; I didn't realize the summer didn't last as long there. Over in the States, we have a tendency to forget just how far south we are - I know geography pretty well, but I'm always surprised on some level to realize that the northernmost point of Maine is directly across only from central France. Granted, I think part of that is because we tend to have pretty weird weather over here sometimes - where I live, it can be 32o C and sunny one minute, 10 minutes later it's 27o and thunderstorming, and then 10 minutes after that it's like it never even rained! We've got a saying, actually: "If you don't like the weather, wait."


 * Anyway, I've never actually been to either the Mediterranean or to Western Europe; while I've traveled all over the USA, and I've been to Canada a couple of times, this was my first time overseas. I actually didn't meet too many Americans while I was in Eastern/Central Europe (to be honest, I wasn't really looking for any - that's a stereotype I try to avoid. :P) - most tend to start out in the West, like France, the UK, or Italy, but I had an opportunity to "jump right in" so I took it. I have to say, I'm very glad I did; it was a fantastic experience. Oh, one more thing; you all in Europe appreciate food so much more than the average American - I'm talking about stuff like using proper ingredients, authentically-sourced products (the other day, I was in my supermarket and found "Parmesan Cheese" made in Wisconsin...), and just generally better cooking. As an Italian-American, that made me very, very happy. Cheers. Zaldax (talk) 13:25, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Peter J. Lucas. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t • c »  01:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Licomp Empirical Multimedia


The article Licomp Empirical Multimedia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:11, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

You could at least wait until I read this message instead of instant deleting......

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:19, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robin Hood – czwarta strzała


The article Robin Hood – czwarta strzała has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)