User talk:Arkansas35

May 2012
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Primerica. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 18:53, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
You may rephrase the sentence without the "sells" as this would seem like advertising. Consider using "Primerica is a financial services company. It is a hybrid model of direct selling, franchising and distribution".

SwisterTwister  talk  22:13, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

&#160;
 * I undid for two reasons: first was the word "unique", which is an opinion or analysis and is not supported by a reliable source. The second is that you removed other material that is cited to a reliable source. The overall appearance is that you disagree with a published report's analysis and substituted your own, but that is not acceptable. Whether it's advertising or promotional or trying to make the organization simply look better (or avoid making it look bad), wikipedia is required to follow published sources not our own feelings or attempts at neutralizing others' negative reports. DMacks (talk) 01:33, 9 May 2012 (UTC)