User talk:Arkenarten65

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Vergo Retail, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. The material you added sounds like piles of speculation/rumor and unsubstantiated analysis/extrapolation. Wikipedia only allows verifiable information and is not for spreading unsubstantiated hypotheses. DMacks (talk) 18:53, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Vergo Retail. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 19:49, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vergo Retail, you may be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 19:50, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

I have been alerted that I should have used rather than  in this situation, it is specific to original research rather than using the over-broad vandalism brush. DMacks (talk) 20:22, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Now I have worked for (Lewis's in Liverpool) Vergo in the past (I dont any more) and even though the company is admin I do know that the colchester store was to be rebranded and new departments with there ownstock added (such as pic n mix) so that buying was centralised. Anyway here is the link to the external plans for signage:- http://www.planning.colchester.gov.uk/WAM/showCaseFile.do;jsessionid=344F0F185D1404F65766EC5900030022?action=show&appType=Planning&appNumber=091301 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.129.234.99 (talk) 12:21, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Note
I'm sorry, I've had to block you for 18 hours to get your attention.

Please read our guidelines on what counts as a reliable source.

"It happened to me directly!!!" isn't good enough, I'm sorry. It's not that we're calling you a liar, it's that liars do exist, and we have no way of knowing who they are or aren't. So we have to rely on third-party sources. DS (talk) 20:19, 7 May 2010 (UTC)