User talk:Arkon/archive2

RfC
There is currently an RfC on CSloat. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Commodore_Sloat. Torturous Devastating Cudgel 22:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Howdy; your IP
Hi, I'm responding to your greetings. I know next to nothing about IP addresses. When you say that you are the owner of the dynamic IP, you mean that you're the primary person using the anonymous IP to edit wikipedia? Is the warning a problem for you? I, of course, intended to address the individual who added a bunch of advertising content to Seneca, South Carolina. It seems likely that this person will use a different IP address the next time he/she edits WP, right? Just out of curiosity, are you physically located anywhere close to Seneca, or is that not the way this works? Feel free to ignore that if you'd prefer not to answer that question. Let me know if there's anything you'd like me to do regarding your IP. Cheers, Darkspots 00:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Dear "boggled"
The "assumed prior knowledge" was about the identity of "Blount". If it reads better, don't name him, just don't have an unidentifed "Blount" appear. "Having a campaign to do" does not necessarily imply "responsibilities", merely the opportunity to work on a campaign. The word has a semantic load which is not justified by the cite. Let me make my POV clear: Bush wasn't needed in the Guard and it's OK with me that he got on with his career. But his "responsibilities" are an invention of the editor who write the line. Andyvphil 00:05, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

The ends justify the means
You're right. This article reads like a political essay. I posted a comment about it at Accuracy dispute.--Dr who1975 20:04, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Plame affair/CIA leak scandal
could you please vote again on a preference for the article name on the talk page? your input could very much help to reach a consensus. thanks!!Anthonymendoza 20:20, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

State terrorism by the United States
Reverting mass blanking without consensus and with no explanation on the talk page nor the edit summary is not constructive. Please reach consensus on the talk page prior to reverting.  K u k i ni  hablame aqui 22:30, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Killian Documents
Thanks for helping to combat User:Callmebc's repeated vandalism of the talk page. 74.77.222.188 20:52, 25 September 2007 (UTC)