User talk:Arkvidhatha

Welcome!

Hello, Arkvidhatha, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Swami Dhesikan Stotra Paata Goshtee, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Osarius : T : C : Been CSD'd? 16:32, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Swami Dhesikan Stotra Paata Goshtee


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Swami Dhesikan Stotra Paata Goshtee, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Osarius : T : C : Been CSD'd? 16:32, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I have deleted this article because it did not assert the notability of its topic by reliable, secondary sources (blogs are not appropriate references). Further, its language and style were not compatible with an English-language encyclopedia (e.g. WP:SHOUTING). I have moved it now to User:Arkvidhatha/Swami Dhesikan Stotra Paata Goshtee for your reference. Please examine the links above before creating new articles. Regards. Materialscientist (talk) 13:36, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Swami Dhesikan Stotra Paata Goshtee


A tag has been placed on Swami Dhesikan Stotra Paata Goshtee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Mean as custard (talk) 13:36, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I  had to delete the article for the second time. It wasn't really improved after the first time, except in format. The primary reason for the deletion was that it was entirely in the nature of an advertisement or promotional article for the movement. This applies to non-profit organizations as well as profit-making companies, to informal as well as formal organizations or movements,    to people as well as organizations, and to anything else for which one  can try to promote or advocate. An article here  needs to be written like an encyclopedia article, not a press release--don't praise the organization , say in neutral language what they do. Don't talk about the overall importance of the subject--talk about what they have accomplished. Don't talk about the fine values being taught. (Is the organization is intended to spread the ideas of a particular teacher? If so, do we have an article on that person?)   Remember not to  copy from a web site -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you give us permission according to WP:DCM, the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable.

Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the subject and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Keep in mind that the goal of an encyclopedia is to say things in a concise manner, which is not the style of  press releases or  web sites, which are usually more expansive. As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know. If you think you can do it right according to our guidelines, do so, but expect the article to be carefully checked for objectivity. If I can help you further, let me know on my user talk page.  DGG ( talk ) 15:04, 18 September 2011 (UTC)