User talk:Arlem.Fraznikito

July 2013
Hello, I'm Kikichugirl. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to City Impact Church New Zealand because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! kikichugirl (talk) 03:50, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello. Just to be clear, people are removing what you've written because --Rhododendrites (talk) 04:23, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) The link you added is just thrown in without context and without creating a link/reference.
 * 2) All content on Wikipedia that could be deemed opinion, subjective, controversial, containing statistics, etc. must be accompanied by a a reliable source backing it up. Please see Verifiability, Reliable sources. Thanks.

Your recent editing history at City Impact Church New Zealand shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Keri (talk) 07:18, 16 July 2013 (UTC)