User talk:ArmadilloFromHell

Nachmansohn article
Hi, thanks for your advice. I'm a first time contributor and I'm having a bit of trouble adding references to the stub; how exactly does one do this? Or is there a useful page to explain it, because I can't seem to locate the details. Also, I intend to write more on Nachmansohn but not until I'm finished with a research project on his life; is it possible that the stub will be deleted before I can add more? Thanks for all of your help, - 14:06, November 6, 2006

Business Card
Hey, before revert anything, take a second to have a look on previous versions. See the versions edited by Richmeister, FayssalF, SiobhanHansa. I require an apology. tontot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tontot (talk • contribs)


 * Please sign posts on talk pages Sign your posts on talk pages


 * Apology for what? In my opinion it is not acceptable in that article and I removed it. -- Armadillo From Hell GateBridge

If this is ONLY your opinion, why don't you discuss on the talk page first? Want to get another star for fighting spams?

I'm a wikinewb but I'm a Photoshop expert
What should I do? I don't know much about Wikipedia but I can handle very well w/ Photoshop (I use CS2) Just wanna contribute to Wikipedia... Help me to help U. Contact Me!

ArmadilloFromHell &rarr; ArmadilloDeanCenter

 * Current name: ArmadilloFromHell (talk • contribs)
 * Requested name: ArmadilloDeanCenter (change username)
 * Reason: I think your username might not have a profanity word. Is it okay if you change your username (and your namestamp)?

WikiProject Law Enforcement Barnstar Proposal Poll
 Hello there ,

We here at Wikiproject Law Enforcement are currently in the process of deciding wither or not to make this WikiProject Law Enforcement's official Barnstar award. Being that you are a member of Wikiproject Law Enforcement, we are humbly asking you to voice your opinion here about our new Barnstar.

Thank You and All the Best, Mifter (talk) 20:33, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

--Mifter (talk) 20:33, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:ArmadilloFromHell/List of ambulance manufacturers
User:ArmadilloFromHell/List of ambulance manufacturers, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ArmadilloFromHell/List of ambulance manufacturers and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:ArmadilloFromHell/List of ambulance manufacturers during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ╟─ TreasuryTag (talk ╬ contribs) ─╢ 11:46, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

You were extremely disruptive during your time as a Wikipedia editor and I can't say you'll be missed. Wikipedia will benefit in the long run now that you're no longer here. --91.85.182.208 (talk) 17:38, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello ArmadilloFromHell! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:32, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Bronwen Hughes -

Survey for new page patrollers
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:16, 25 October 2011 (UTC).

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Steel Tec


The article Steel Tec has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline nor the more detailed Notability (companies)'s requirement for products. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)