User talk:ArmadilloFromHell/Archive 07/Month Feb

Breast
What's inappropriate in linking to information about a documentary about breasts on the Breast page? Ciotog 19:14, 22 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't feel it belongs there, but feel free to discuss it on the talk page. -- Armadillo From Hell GateBridge
 * You're supposed to reach consensus before deleting content, unless it's clearly innapropriate. It might be nice of you to add it back, and then respond to the section on the talk page outlining your position. Ciotog 10:10, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Armadillo
created more sockpuppets that were blocked last night, ,.

He almost certainly is the same all of these Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Cyber Lopez

The following need blocks:

Created more sockpuppets last night e.g. (copied my profile) and  (copy of another profile)

Possible other sockpuppets

Suggestions are welcome - his latest post on my talk page indicates he is not about to stop

Hey, I'm here all day my friend. I can keep this up. Welcome indeed. Jack Lopez 04:39, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Me too. Bart Lopez 04:41, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

LOL. Homer Lopez 04:43, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello Armadillo
Please do not edit the user pages of other contributors without their approval or consent. It may be seen as vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please visit the sandbox.

LOL. Ralph Lopez 04:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Someday you will run out of first names LOL -- Armadillo From Hell GateBridge 04:56, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

If you want to be friends I can give you my E-mail. As you know I like Wikipedia. I won't vandlize it. I have been contributing for 2 years now. Jimbo Lopez 05:00, 26 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but someone killed you before I could even sockpuppet tag you -- Armadillo From Hell GateBridge 05:02, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Nope I'm still here buddy. Tommy Lopez 05:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Please stop, I was talking to Jimbo, who is now dead, please do not interfere with private conversations. -- Armadillo From Hell GateBridge  05:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:CHILD
I don't think we have an official policy right now. A few months ago, I requested the deletion of a 10-year-old's user page because it included way too much personal information. By the way, the WP:CHILD proposal was based on the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act. It applies to kids under 13, so a 16-year-old would fall outside the guidelines. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs)  04:56, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Please consider reformatting your user page
Users that are stuck with 1024x768 will be unable to view half of your user boxes unless they scroll sideways or hide the sidebar. I noticed because I am one of those users. Will (Talk - contribs) 22:39, 28 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes, thanks, I noticed last week when I was on my wife's computer. -- Armadillo From Hell GateBridge  23:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

John Wayne Vandal
Where did you get the template for saying they have been reported. I like it. Thanks for the help with that. Love how they say reverting blatant vandalism is biased. There are plenty of article I am personally biased agaisnt but I don't blank them change them or otherwise change them. It takes all kinds as they say. --Xiahou 01:49, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Persistent guy LOL. //subst:Non-admin fwarn// replace // with double braces -- Armadillo From Hell GateBridge 01:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, just examining the issue of blacklisting, referring to his having advocated the same as "pro-American ideals" is clearly hogwash. Many law abiding actors -- who were never Communists -- lost their jobs and livelihoods as a result of McCarthyism. I'd be content with just removal of the term "pro-American ideals," without any further discussion about his blatant racist and homophobic views.

Obviously you're a Republican, but Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral, and "pro-American ideals" is far from a neutral term. "Conservative views" or "conservative beliefs" is more appropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.111.41.98 (talk • contribs)


 * Obviously he is a good editor reverting said vandalism you kept posting over and over uncited statements such as "Wayne was further known to advocate discrimination against gay and lesbian Americans. " no citation and a rather smearing statment. This was the lesser of your vandalisms. How about "and was very homophobic and biased against gays" with no citation. Obviously you need to learn what NPOV means. Sorry ArmadilloFromHell, don't know why he just put this here on yours and not mine as well. As a participant in this I felt obligated to respond. If you have better more eloquent words to put him in his place, enjoy. Thanks again. --Xiahou 02:07, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Wow - is it really that obvious, I never knew I was so open in my political party. On the other hand, dream on in fantasy land, not only do I not vote for a president, I don't even live in the USA. -- Armadillo From Hell GateBridge  02:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * haha you don't even live in the US. Oh the irony. Guess you weren't obvious enough. Take care --Xiahou 02:23, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Watch Out for a Spoofer
Watch out you got a spoofer, better report him :P....¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 04:23, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks - first time I've had that - but where does it get reported AIV? -- Armadillo From Hell GateBridge 04:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Big Brother 1984 05:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

--- Sorry about that, but do you realize that on the Belmont, Massachusetts article you sorted entries for "Expert of Feline Cunnalingus", "Activist Rabbi", and "Professor of Narcotics".... lol --- Big Brother 1984 05:42, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Duh ^*$%^(!#%^&X - Can I get a special award for that??????? -- Armadillo From Hell GateBridge 05:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Heh, you already got the award. "Thank you for experimenting...". :-)  Hey, Big Brother 1984 didn't do any better -- he just reverted to the unsorted version. :-) -- Jim Douglas (talk)  (contribs)  05:46, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I probably should have looked at the history first, but as soon as I saw "Feline Cunnalingus"(sic) I jumped right for the revert/warn button. My bad. ( But you must admit, it was kinda funny ^>^ ) - Big Brother 1984 05:51, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Once past my initial fury at being stupid, I thought it was kind of funny. Maybe the anon should get a Barnstar for creative vandalism -- Armadillo From Hell GateBridge 05:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I already sent him a token of our appreciation. It was kinda funny, but I didn't want to encourage him by telling him that. :-) -- Jim Douglas (talk)  (contribs)  06:07, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

WikiProjectFireService
Hi there, I don't know whether you noticed or not but you have been made Deputy Chief of Operations on WikiProject Fire Service, me and Daysleeper47 have worked together to create some templates for deputies' userpages' saying that you are a deputy. Here is the code. Me and Escaper 7 are UK deputies (made by daysleeper) and you have been made a general deputy by daysleeper47, with him being the chief. Here is the code for it

{{FireServiceWikiProject-Deputy))

Well have a good day and if you have any comments or questions please feel free to contact me, Daysleeper47 or Escaper7.  Telly addict  14:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Very cool. I've been tied up with real world commitments for the last few weeks and have not contributed much. Hopefully I'll get back soon. -- Armadillo From Hell GateBridge 14:25, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Your report on 209.16.118.2 to WP:AIV
FYI: Just wanted to let you know that I removed your report without action because the IP hadn't vandalised since your final warning. I'm not sure if you were using a tool such as VandalProof to make this report, but it's best to wait until an IP has vandalised after the final warning before making the report. Please keep up the good work! Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 15:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Too lenient from my POV. Blocked for a week, came back and did 3 on Columbine High School massacre, got a warning and then another "Last warning", ignored those and did 2 on Oreo -- Armadillo From Hell GateBridge  15:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * If this was a single user, I'd agree with you. However, this appears to be a dynamic IP, and is therefore coming from many different users. Therefore, I would treat each new "group" of vandalism as coming from a different person (unless there's a repeat in pattern from previous incidents), although for an IP that has repeated vandalism, I tend to use bv or test2/test3/test4 instead of a test1 like I'd normally do for a newbie. Since there was no new vandalism after the last final warning, the last individual using the IP likely got the "New message" indicator and stopped vandalising. If someone else comes along and persists in vandalising after a final warning, a block will therefore be appropriate. I certainly have no qualms about long term blocks on IPs with a long history of vandalism, but I want to be sure it hits the right people. --Deathphoenix ʕ 18:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Nevetheless, since he was not blocked - he continues to vandalize, but I won't waste my time reporting him again. -- Armadillo From Hell GateBridge 03:11, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * If he's appropriately warned, I'd be happy to block. In fact, I'll check in the IP now. --Deathphoenix ʕ 14:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Your a terrible editor
"Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Boxing page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 02:09, 31 January 2007 (UTC)" What i did to the boxing page was not vandilsm at all, the shovel hook is indeed a real punch and vey useful. Learn something about what your deleting before you delete it please, other viewers may actually want to learn something new.

Mitch —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.162.147.45 (talk • contribs)


 * I assume you are joking. What you added was --
 * A combonation between the hook and the upercut usually preformed in south paw stance, however more expirenced boxers may preform it an orthdox stance. The boxer Dips his body forward and throw hishand 70 degrees upwords towords the ribs. Made famous by Rocky, and broguht back by Mike tyson, the punch is commonly confused with an uppercut while it is not, Commoly followed with a cross punch. 


 * --which is an incomprehensible, unreadable and unacceptable paragraph and not anything that anyone wants to see in Wikipedia


 * And in addition, all the recent edits from this IP address are all pure vandalism. -- Armadillo From Hell GateBridge 00:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, ArmadilloFromHell! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 18:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Hello!
Hey friend! I'll be making some changes here at Wikipedia. If you have a message for me, please email me at [mailto:asher@asherheimermann.com asher@asherheimermann.com]. I most likely not reply to you on my talkpage. Have a great day! Mr. Asher Heimermann 15:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Talk pages are for discussions - but since you are not likely to reply, I am not wasting time posting on your talk page. I will not be using your email. -- Armadillo From Hell GateBridge 15:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Armadillo reincarnation theory
"...Some believe that armadillos are actually dead porcupines who have been reanimated by a lightning strike while a copper coin is in their mouths. This jolt of electricity purportedly brings the porcupines back to life while also causing a secretion which hardens within minutes to cover the quills..."

Only somewhat doubtful? I was trying to imagine how all these dead armadillos wind up with copper coins in their mouths... :)  Kuru  talk  02:10, 6 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I though it was WP:AGF LOL -- Armadillo From Hell GateBridge 03:04, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Coca-Cola Zero Cherry
I am unclear why you removed the reference to Coca Cola Zero Cherry. The information was accurate.

I will not address the armadillo issue, as there are many nay-sayers such as yourself, who are, no doubt, anti-possum activists. --Lawcomic 18:41, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Vandal on final warning has reoffended
Hi. I noticed that you put a final warning on User talk:169.244.75.145. I'm not sure of the process from here but I just reverted vandalism by this user to Transvestism, Drag queen and National Industrial Recovery Act. --AliceJMarkham 20:45, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok, Take a look at what I did. I added a couple more warnings - although there really is no need to at this point. Then I did this  at WP:AIV. Keep an eye on his block log  and see what happens -- Armadillo From Hell GateBridge  05:06, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * (10 mimutes later)Well it seems that the admin that looked at it decided not to block him - which makes me feel that I wasted a lot of time issuing those warnings - I'm not happy seeing this get ignored. It seems admins have different views - someone I reported yesterday with less vandalism got a 1 month block - which is what this one should have got also. -- Armadillo From Hell GateBridge 05:23, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Reason for including a page on Professor G. D. Yadav
This is with reference to my contribution that you deleted. Here is proposal urging you to revert your decision.

Why is this person important?

1. He is the Head of the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University Institute of Chemical Technology, India's premier chemical sciences university (as rated by Prof. Jude Sommerfield of Georgia Tech.

2. He is an elected member of the Indian National Academy of Sciences - India's apex body for science and technology.

3. He is the Dean of Resources Management and Mobilization at UICT. 3. He was recently awarded Maharashtra State's Best Technical Educator of the year 2006.

4. His contributions have been recognized by his peers in both academia and industry, and has been bestowed with the Anji Reddy Innovator of the Year for 2006.

5. He has been biographed in Marquis' Who's Who in Science and Technology.

Thanks for your time.


 * I have no idea what you are talking about, I have no ability to delete articles. (I also do not generally respond to cryptic unsigned posts) -- Armadillo From Hell GateBridge 02:17, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Werdnabot archives
You misclicked something when changing the year on the Werdnabot tag, and it was archiving to pages with strange names. I've fixed the tag and moved the archives to the correct place. --cesarb 17:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)