User talk:Armanswaroop

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Kabir Khan (director), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:42, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Armanswaroop.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Armanswaroop.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:51, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your contributed article, List of people from uttar pardesh


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of people from uttar pardesh. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of people from Uttar Pradesh. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of people from Uttar Pradesh – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.  Pink Bull  15:42, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Arman Swaroop filmography


The article Arman Swaroop filmography has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. GregJackP  Boomer!   16:48, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

I've moved the inappropriate content of your user page here to give you a chance to make it encyclopaedic. If that doesn't happen, or if it isn't written in a neutral style, I'll delete it again  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  16:39, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Armanswaroop/sandbox (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Armanswaroop/sandbox (disambiguation), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — kikichugirl  inquire 04:37, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:02, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Hoaxes, advertising, sockpuppetry
I've blocked sockpuppet account User:Arman vasisth swaroop and removed the obvious hoax you've constructed from that account's userpage and from this talkpage. It's clear that this is all made up or copied from articles relating to Salman Khan: I checked the references. If this happens again I'll block this account indefinitely and create-protect related titles.  Acroterion   (talk)   15:01, 27 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Please do not put the hoax back on your userpage. It is disruptive and will lead to a block on this account if it continues.  Acroterion   (talk)   12:00, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Acroterion   (talk)   11:30, 27 August 2013 (UTC)