User talk:Armengol amill

July 2019
Hello, I'm Jc3s5h. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Guinness World Records, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

The allusion to authority you make, a notarization that is followed by obtaining a apostille, does not indicate any approval or endorsement of the contents of a document by the notary, or the government that issues the apostille. It merely confirms the identity of the author of the statement. In the past, fake universities that issue degrees for a large fee, but little or no effort by the student, have used apostilles to try to bolster the acceptance of their worthless degrees. As a result, many people throughout the world are aware of the potential for misuse of apostilles.

In addition, vague claims about acceptance of world records in general are impossible to support. Each person gets to decide which world record to accept and which to ignore. Jc3s5h (talk) 14:51, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

hello!

I've asked for changes a while ago. I think it would be good if I did not start it again

Guinness is one of the two registers of the existing world record, the other that coexists, is the innovator to be an NGO, it is the Official World Record that together with Guinness is the only internationally renowned, the second OFFICIAL WORLD RECORD even recognized by the illustrious universities of notaries in the world, through a notary document also is a brand recognized and registered by the Office of the Intellectual Property of the European Union (EUIPO) with the number 013986054.

Thank you for the attention and forgive my little initial knowledge ok?

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Guinness World Records, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jc3s5h (talk) 22:41, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Captura de pantalla 2019-05-09 a les 10.33.58.png


A tag has been placed on File:Captura de pantalla 2019-05-09 a les 10.33.58.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CptViraj (📧) 11:27, 7 September 2019 (UTC)