User talk:Armhouse

This topic needs a broader perspective than what is displayed.

I was dissapointed that none of the views interpreting the meanings of life involved the sustainability of the planet earth, or even the sustainability of the human species. If this is not a concern in your meaning of life, you are basically saying you don't care about your children or the home that supports your existance.

Given the obvious destructive impact of the human race on the planet in the relatively short time we have existed on it, it is ignorant to ignore the implication of our actions on this planet in terms of sustainability.

There is no mention of a philosophy that includes sustainability as a priority, this is quite dissapointing, and an indictment on the failure of philosophy.

Black holes
Interested in your late addition re relic civilizations, which did not survive, probably due to lack of external sourcing. Wikipedia is extremely strict (though enforcement is spotty) on the subject of original research, and the reasons are pretty good, though a constant pain in the neck. If you know of any "reliable external sources" (including your own work, if refereed and published) then that would help keep your ideas in place. It may be that the black hole article is not the place for them, as the LHC article is more to the point, and the whole business (of the viability of intelligent life in the universe) is really of much wider import than just the black hole article.

By the way, I am not sure if you wrote the lead lines on this page, but signing with four tildes helps keep the authorship clear on user and article talk pages (which are the only places it works). I will stick a Wiki welcome template in below that gives a bunch of useful links you may find helpful.

Cheers, Wwheaton (talk) 23:56, 26 April 2008 (UTC)