User talk:Armitage166

February 2023
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 15:41, 1 March 2023 (UTC)


 * That wasn't a test edit. I made a table and it was accurate. Armitage166 (talk) 15:44, 1 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The dab links created here were most definitely NOT accurate. I was being generous calling them a test. As he has written all of the films in the filmography the column table is wasting space. If he had directed a film that he hadn't written that might be different. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 21:04, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The links I've used are accurate. It's absurd to say otherwise.
 * I've been editing anonymously for 14 years on Wikipedia. I know what I'm doing. I've added hundreds of tables to filmmaker pages. They improve the experience, regardless of your comments on whether he's written all the films as well. What's to say Greenaway won't eventually NOT write one of his films!? You're just being belligerent for little reason because you think backing down will lose you face. You'd rather destroy a good Wikipedia editor's work with your destructive
 * It's people like you who make Wikipedia a worse place and push people away from editing.
 * Do NOT change my edits again. Armitage166 (talk) 15:11, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 15:03, 3 March 2023 (UTC)


 * See the exchange. My edits improve Wikipedia. The person destructively deleting does not.
 * If you continue with this line of reasoning, I'd be more than happy to take my editing elsewhere. Armitage166 (talk) 15:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * On Wikipedia, you need to get others to support your changes through discussion (on article talk pages, not in edit summaries). Edit warring will only get you blocked, as you have now been warned. Personal attacks are not a substitute for discussion, either. MrOllie (talk) 15:31, 3 March 2023 (UTC)