User talk:Armon/Archive 1 Jul 2007

Your revert on Allegations of Israeli apartheid page
While I'm sure your revert was made in good faith, I think it would have been better if you could have included an explanation as to why you reverted my own good faith edits. I don't see any comments by you on the talk page or references to other people's comments. In the future, if you revert good faith edits, I request that you provide an explanation. Thank you. Organ123 00:39, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Are you talking about the Timeline? I thought I made it clear in the edit summary -the events I removed were WP:OR. &lt;&lt;-armon-&gt;&gt; 00:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I am not talking about the timeline -- I am talking about my edits in the Overview section, the ones before the edits with the timeline, which I believe you also reverted. Was this done by accident? Or are you saying my edits were WP:OR? Thanks ... Organ123 01:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, OK, well the link you replaced was to a blog, which is not a WP:RS. &lt;&lt;-armon-&gt;&gt; 01:35, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


 * OK. I'm not sure if the source was technically a blog, but I'll agree if you don't think it was reputable or reliable. In that case, can you restore the wording, without the source? The wording was a compromise between eliminating the section outright and leaving it exactly as-is. Perhaps a "citation needed" tag would be better than deleting the wording outright. There are other sources I could add instead. Organ123 01:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The problem is, there was a perfectly good source for Duke's statements in the version I reverted to, and there isn't any need to preface them with the phrase "Critics of the analogy". &lt;&lt;-armon-&gt;&gt; 03:53, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * OK. Organ123 04:25, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Juan Cole
Due to your participation in an edit war on, I have proposed that you and Commodore Sloat be placed on community revert probation. Please see Community_sanction_noticeboard. John254 02:41, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Mackenzie Institute
Armon,

You are currently in violation of the three-revert rule. Please self-revert your last edit, or I will be forced to report you. CJCurrie 23:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I miscounted and thought it was a day ago. Thanks for letting me know. &lt;&lt;-armon-&gt;&gt; 23:52, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

The document is one of the few "anti-terror" manuals to be released in Canada, and received attention (and controversy) within credible newspaper sources. I'm not sure how you can describe it as "non-notable". CJCurrie 00:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

WP:CEM
Are you still interested in moving forward with the mediation? If not I'll close the case. Durova Charge! 20:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

3RR Warning
You have already made 3 edits at Palestinian people deleting the same sourced paragraph. If you delete this paragraph again, you will violate 3RR. Tiamut 14:22, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Mediation Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-05-20 Al-Aqsa Intifada
You are involved in the MedCab case Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-05-20 Al-Aqsa Intifada. Please, you are invited to join in the discussion. GofG undefinedundefinedundefined Talk 14:32, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Mediation MEMRI
I already asked on the MEMRI talk page but you typically ignored me, choosing instead to simply delete my text. Do you agree to go to Mediation Cabal re: MEMRI page? Thank you, Jgui 00:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
We may disagree on other matters, but thank you for your reversion and report of the persistent Runtshit vandal. RolandR 09:33, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem. Easy consensus on that one ;) &lt;&lt;-armon-&gt;&gt; 10:33, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

3RR Block
 You have been blocked for violating the three revert rule on Anti-Zionism after many previous 3RR blocks. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Selket Talk 22:42, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Whoops. I clicked the wrong link. My sincere apologies. --Selket Talk 22:55, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem, but the autoblock is still on- it that the right template? &lt;&lt;-armon-&gt;&gt; 23:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

It should be cleared now. Try editing again. --Selket Talk 23:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Still no joy -it's Autoblock ID: 512073 &lt;&lt;-armon-&gt;&gt; 23:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, hold on, I'm contacting some people. --Selket Talk 23:05, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Try now. --Selket Talk 23:05, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Hello. Just so you know, I've moved your comment on my RfA to the support section since it appears you were kidding. Pascal.Tesson 03:26, 29 May 2007 (UTC)