User talk:Armymp0165

Warnings
 Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings. Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the [ page history]. [Admin: block | [ unblock] / Info: contribs | [ page moves] | [ block log] | [ block list]]

February 2008

 * 1) [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Silent Spring, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 00:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits.  Yilloslime (t) 01:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Rachel Carson and Silent Spring
I understand that you dispute material on these articles. Please don't take offense at other editors reverting your edits. The best practice is to raise the issue on the talk page. Bold edits are fine in many instances; however, they will almost always be reverted if you don't leave an edit summary. Even when you leave an edit summary, other editors will often disagree with you and it is common for them to revert your change and expect to discuss the difference of opinion on the article's talk page. See WP:BRD for more information on this process. I would also note that these are articles on Rachel Carson and her seminal work Silent Spring, they should reflect the opinions of Rachel Carson as the opinions of Rachel Carson, not as necessary facts, but her opinions and conclusions really have to be covered, even if they are in dispute or even if they have been proven wrong. I look forward to your comments at Talk:Rachel Carson and/or Talk:Silent Spring.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 01:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Police explorer post 525
A tag has been placed on Police explorer post 525 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Beach drifter (talk) 00:37, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Warning
Hello, while inspecting the article Gaston County Police Department i have found that most information was copied from www.co.gaston.nc.us please consider finding another way to provide information, When your new to editing it becomes easy to just copy things from websites but you can't use directly copied text from websites on wikipedia.

Thanks Chad01