User talk:ArnabSaha/Archive 2



  Archive Two Archive 1 ← ⚛️ → Archive 3 

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes for 30 days after which you may apply for permanent extension of the right. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: Chetsford (talk) 15:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.


 * thank you... Smiley.svg অর্ণব S a   h a  17:12, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages
I see you recently accepted a pending change to October 10 that did not include a direct source.

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the content guideline and the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. I've gone ahead and un-accepted this edit and backed it out.

All the pages in the Days of the Year project have had pending changes protection turned on to prevent vandalism and further addition of entries without direct sources. As a pending changes patroller, please do not accept additions to day of year pages where no direct source has been provided on that day of year page. The burden to provide sources for additions to these pages is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 15:49, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * i accepted that version, since most of the events didnt have citations. and also in the novel's article page, the date was mention. ok, i will keep this in mind. Smiley.svg অর্ণব S a   h a  17:04, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply - all good. A lot of folks aren't aware of the change. Please keep up the great work that you do.  Toddst1 (talk) 20:35, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject India
 WikiProject India

'Namaste'', Arnabsaha2212. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.'''  Subscribe

Newsletter discussion

Contribute

Subscribe/Unsubscribe

Archive

Sent by on behalf of WikiProject India. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

I-League
You need to understand that promotion and relegated is required to form a football pyramid, ISL can be the superior league but it doesn't fall in the pyramid, when promotion & relegation will start we can include it in the pyramid, but for now don't vandalise & create misconceptions.

October 2019
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

There is a talk page of the article, discuss there without doing edit wars. You both are on the verge of getting blocked. Dey subrata (talk) 16:33, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Ya, I know. thats why already I started a discussion in WP:WPF talkpage to reach a conclusion and solve the made, since normal discussion between me and him wont lead anywhere. Smiley.svg অর্ণব S a   h a  17:47, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter – October 2019
 WikiProject India


 * GA icon.svg Newly recognized content
 * The month of October 2019 started with Gateway of India re-attaining its Good Article status and the Sanjay Dutt filmography was recognized as Featured List.




 * GA onhold.svg Newly nominated content


 * List of international goals scored by Sunil Chhetri
 * List of chief ministers of Jharkhand
 * Bengal famine of 1943
 * India national football team at the Olympics
 * Rakta Sambandham


 * News Paper Flat Icon.svg  News
 * Article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page on October 2, 2019.
 * (pictured) has ended, which celebrates the victory of good over evil.
 * There are a lot of high-quality images on Commons uploaded by Itsmalay which can be used on some India cultural monuments articles.
 * is nominated to appear on the main page on November 3.
 * Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous
 * You can join the discussions opened at.
 * You can join the RfC on superlatives sentence at Talk:India.


 * Current event compact.svg  Events
 * Events that occoured on October.


 * Gandhi Jayanti (2 October)
 * Digital Society Day (17 October)
 * Martyrs' Day (21 October)
 * Accession Day (Jammu and Kashmir) (26 October)
 * Thevar Jayanthi (30 October)
 * Rashtriya Ekta Diwas (31 October)

Discuss this newsletter

Contribute

Subscribe/Unsubscribe

Archive

Sent by on behalf of WikiProject India. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:20, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 26
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * 2019–20 Indian Super League season ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2019%E2%80%9320_Indian_Super_League_season check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2019%E2%80%9320_Indian_Super_League_season?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to David Williams
 * East Bengal F.C. ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/East_Bengal_F.C. check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/East_Bengal_F.C.?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Abhijit Sarkar

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:16, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:East Bengal first logo.png
Thank you for uploading File:East Bengal first logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Your signature
Signature may not contain images. (WP:SIGIMAGE) Your signature is also too long. (WP:SIGLEN) Please adjust it accordingly. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 03:44, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
 * ok. I will shorten it, and remove the emoji. Smiley.svg অর্ণব S a   h a  04:47, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
 * is it correct now?  S A H  A  11:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
 * That's good. Thanks. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 04:15, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (Postgraduate)


A tag has been placed on National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (Postgraduate) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://results.amarujala.com/exam-alerts/nbe-neet-pg-2019-check-exam-date-pattern-and-other-details-here. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Onel 5969  TT me 00:29, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am aware of copyright violations in wikipedia. I created this page National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (Postgraduate), since this exam and National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (Undergraduate) this one are different. And National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (Undergraduate) this article focuses on Undergraduate one. so, i created the postgraduate article. I just copied the existing info in undergraduate article, and pasted in postgraduate. so, now it violates copyright, but i shouldnt be punished for that. also, no time was given to contest, and modify the article.  S A H  A  09:59, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
 * there should be enough time to contest deletion and modify the article.  S A H  A  19:50, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi. I don't set the timeframe on speedy deletes. But you can contact the admin who deleted the page, which in this case is, and ask them about it. Onel 5969  TT me
 * So I asked privately for a second opinion from another sysop about this deletion as your explanation here seemed fair. In the end as we looked at the deleted content and against the content from other sites, as well as National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (Undergraduate) the thinking was that we should err on the side of keeping it deleted. We tend to be very cautious about potential copyright issues. I would certainly encourage you to give the exam another go - making sure you put information into your own words (obviously the table is going to be more factual). Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:04, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I want to recreate that article, is there any way to have a look in the deleted one, so that I can pickup points on the basis of which I can create the new one? Also, is there any way, I can check whether any article is copyrighted or not?  S A H  A  09:47, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , because it was deleted for COPYVIO I can't give you a copy of the old article. Sorry. As you work on a draft you can run it through this detector which will do a comparison. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:01, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * but originally that article wasnt written by me. 😅  S A H  A  19:46, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , I understand but the point still stands. I think starting with a version of National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (Undergraduate) changed to the graduate information would be the first step. Beyond that adding information in your own words to fill out the article. Did you understand my Earwig suggestion? Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 20:41, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * ok. thank you very much. :)  S A H  A  20:52, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: Beeblebrox (talk) 22:50, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
 * thanks a lot.  S A H  A  16:13, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. However, do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Thanks! P.S. If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you.

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter – November 2019
 WikiProject India


 * GA icon.svg Newly recognized content
 * November 2019 recognized content includes: List of international goals scored by Sunil Chhetri  List of chief ministers of Jharkhand  Hindi Medium.




 * GA onhold.svg Newly nominated content


 * Karaikudi S. Subramanian
 * K.G.F: Chapter 1
 * Mahavira


 * Created by Sahibdin and nominated for Featured Media by


 * News Paper Flat Icon.svg  News
 * A significant number of the new articles received each day are about South Asian topics, mainly biographies and cultural themes, along with the usual spam for companies. There is a huge backlog at the NewPagesFeed and more editors with experience and knowledge of Indian subjects are urgently needed to patrol the pages. If you are already a New Page Reviewer, please help out as much as you can. If you are not, please check out WP:NPP, then take a look at the requirements at WP:NPR and if you feel up to it, apply for the New Page Reviewer right at WP:PERM.
 * Kalapani territory has been a subject of edit warring by multiple editors. Kalapani is a disputed area between Nepal and India. The page was fully protected from 10 to 17 November. You're welcomed to patrol the page and keep your eyes on the new editors. Makes sure to assume good faith while editing the page.
 * An editor is pushing too high Jain POV in Jainism related articles. Join the conversation about the user at the noticeboard
 * India Search Result is a bot-generated page that tracks newly created articles related to India. It is a place to look out for new page pages. The page is updated daily and make sure to add it to your watchlist.


 * Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous
 * There are 14 Did You Know nominations, 25 Good Article nominations, 2 Featured Articles candidates, and 1 Featured List candidate to be reviewed.
 * The Swaminarayan Sampraday and Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh are opened for requested comments.
 * You can review these article: Mouna Ragam, Everest (Indian TV series), Arjun Sarja filmography and Mullum Malarum for a peer review.

Discuss this newsletter

Contribute

Subscribe/Unsubscribe

Archive

Sent by on behalf of WikiProject India. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Juan Mera
I have reversed your copy & paste move. Please use WP:RM in future. GiantSnowman 10:39, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * after the article, named Juan Mera González got deleted, i asked to restore it few days back. i got the article with name User:Arnabsaha2212/Juan Mera González. I was adding info there, but once I opened it, it showed different content. I got confused and scared, and the new name was Juan Mera (footballer). I reverted it, copyied and pasted it in Juan Mera González. Ya, I should have moved the page and reverted. That was my mistake.  S A H  A  12:11, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Bangabasi College
Hello. Your recent edit to Bangabasi College appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:07, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Information orange.svg Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bangabasi College, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - 18:07, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter – December 2019
 WikiProject India


 * GA icon.svg Newly recognized content
 * December 2019 recognized content includes:


 * List of India national football team hat-tricks
 * Blue Pilgrims




 * GA onhold.svg Newly nominated content


 * Chandrayaan-2
 * Surat
 * Golaghat


 * Created by


 * News Paper Flat Icon.svg  News
 * The holiday season has begun. WikiProject India Wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade. We look forward to working with you in 2020!
 * Editor started a conversation about Lists of notable people in articles about places back in November and it still needs more editor's opinion on the subject.
 * Join a disscusion about formatting writing credits and music credits. The discussion is about Indian films having some differences from Western films in terms of writing and music credits.
 * India Search Result is a bot-generated page that tracks newly created articles related to India. It is a place to look out for new page pages. The page is updated daily and make sure to add it to your watchlist.


 * Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous
 * There are 17 Did You Know nominations, 20 Good Article nominations, and 1 Featured Articles candidates to be reviewed.
 * You can join the discussion at In_the_news/Candidates.
 * There are 3 articles waiting to be peer-reviewed.

Discuss this newsletter

Contribute

Subscribe/Unsubscribe

Archive

Sent by on behalf of WikiProject India. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 08:40, 26 December 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)

Your GA nomination of East Bengal Ultras
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article East Bengal Ultras you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 12:41, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of East Bengal Ultras
The article East Bengal Ultras you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:East Bengal Ultras for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 13:02, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * thank you. will try to rectify these.  :) S A H  A  13:12, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy New Year!
And the same to you as well! GiantSnowman 13:35, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Arnabsaha2212!


Happy New Year! Arnabsaha2212, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Sony R (talk) 11:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

I league
Your recent editing history at 2019–20 I-League shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially, as the page in question is currently under restrictions from the Arbitration Committee, if you violate the one-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than one revert on a single page with active Arbitration Committee restrictions within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the one-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the one-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Your edits are showing that you are trying be WP:POINTy, by continuously reverting edits here, 1 and here 2. When an editor reverted your edit you must open an discussion rather than going on to WP:EDITWAR. Secondly, You have simply violated WP:BLP and WP:BURDEN, I don't see any kind of citation whenever you have added the materials. Dey subrata (talk) 22:39, 25 January 2020 (UTC)