User talk:Arnabdey13

Speedy deletion nomination of Check Cyber Crime
Hello Arnabdey13,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Check Cyber Crime for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mindcap (talk) 08:16, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Being Motivated: Real key to succeed


The article Being Motivated: Real key to succeed has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * unsourced essay/ horribly overwritten dictdef.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 14:11, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Arnab Dey
Hello Arnabdey13,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Arnab Dey for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 14:26, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Arnab Dey. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 14:34, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

The article Being Motivated: Real key to succeed has been deleted. The immediate reason for that is that its contents were copied from other sources, infringing copyright. It is almost never acceptable to post content to Wikipedia copied from anywhere else. However, even if there had been no copyright problem, the article would almost certainly have been deleted fairly soon, as it was not at all the sort of thing that is acceptable as a Wikipedia article, for various reasons, including the fact that it was written as though its purpose was to persuade the reader of a particular point of view, rather than as neutral recording of objective facts. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:20, 7 October 2016 (UTC)


 * When I posted the above message, I had not noticed that you had already been informed about copyright infringement five days before you created that article. If you continue to edit in ways which you have already been told are unacceptable it is likely that an administrator will block you from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:27, 7 October 2016 (UTC)