User talk:Arnabrchakrab/sandbox

Total:19  out of 20 I thought your article was very good, especially for such a broad topic. Maybe just make it flow a little better/a little ore readable. Otherwise, great! Lindsay Binkow (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Quality of Information: 2
 * 2) Article size:2
 * 3) Readability:1
 * 4) Refs:2
 * 5) Links:2
 * 6) Responsive to comments:2
 * 7) Formatting:2
 * 8) Writing:2
 * 9) Used real name or has real name on User TALK page:2
 * 10) Outstanding?:2

Peer Review from Matthew Birdsell
-

_______________
 * 1) Quality of Information: 2
 * 2) Article size: 2 (Smaller than expected)
 * 3) Readability: 1
 * 4) Refs: 1
 * 5) Links: 2
 * 6) Responsive to comments: 2
 * 7) Formatting: 2
 * 8) Writing: 2
 * 9) Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
 * 10) Outstanding: 2

Total:   18    out of 20

Comments: I thought that this was a good article. Maybe you could go through and make things a little more concise and to the point. A lot of good information although a lot of it comes from primary sources. I think as the other editors (who i think were extremely harsh) did make a valid point that the facts displayed need to have a few more secondary sources to verify their validity. Other than references and maybe a few structural adjustments this article is very good.

Mbirdsell3 (talk) 20:52, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

-


 * 1) Quality of Information: 2
 * 2) Article size: 2
 * 3) Readability: 1
 * 4) Refs: 2
 * 5) Links: 2
 * 6) Responsive to comments: 2
 * 7) Formatting: 1
 * 8) Writing: 2
 * 9) Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
 * 10) Outstanding?: 1

Total: 17 out of 20

I feel like you might have bitten off more than you can chew with the article itself, as there's a LOT of information that has to be covered. I think you did a commendable job doing it, but what you did cover was pretty good. I think the people who removed your page did so knowing that there's still information that has yet to be covered, and thus they knew that the page wasn't quite ready to be up on the website. Some minor sentences seem out of place or unfit for an encyclopedia like Wikipedia, ie "There are still many mechanisms of the motor system that are currently being discovered and have yet to be discovered." from the intro, but nothing incredibly notable that must be removed. You were a couple minutes late uploading it (after midnight) but it's not a big deal either.

Mcarlson7 (talk) 22:14, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Medical Translation Newsletter
 Wikiproject Medicine; Translation Taskforce

Medical Translation Newsletter

Issue 1, June/July 2014 by CFCF, Doc James

sign up for monthly delivery



This is the first of a series of newsletters for Wikiproject Medicine's Translation Task Force. Our goal is to make all the medical knowledge on Wikipedia available to the world, in the language of your choice. note: you will not receive future editions of this newsletter unless you *sign up*; you received this version because you identify as a member of WikiProject Medicine

Spotlight - Simplified article translation

Wikiproject Medicine started translating simplified articles in February 2014. We now have 45 simplified articles ready for translation, of which the first on African trypanosomiasis or sleeping sickness has been translated into 46 out of ~100 languages. This list does not include the 33 additional articles that are available in both full and simple versions.

Our goal is to eventually translate 1,000 simplified articles. This includes:
 * WHO's list of Essential Medicines
 * Neglected tropical diseases
 * Key diseases for medical subspecialties like: oncology, emergency medicine (list), anatomy, internal medicine, surgery, etc.

We are looking for subject area leads to both create articles and recruit further editors. We need people with basic medical knowledge who are willing to help out. This includes to write, translate and especially integrate medical articles.

What's happening?

I've () taken on the role of community organizer for this project, and will be working with this until December. The goals and timeline can be found here, and are focused on getting the project on a firm footing and to enable me to work near full-time over the summer, and part-time during the rest of the year. This means I will be available for questions and ideas, and you can best reach me by mail or on my talk page.
 * IEG grant

For those going to London in a month's time (or those already nearby) there will be at least one event for all medical editors, on Thursday August 7th. See the event page, which also summarizes medicine-related presentations in the main conference. Please pass the word on to your local medical editors.
 * Wikimania 2014

There has previously been some resistance against translation into certain languages with strong Wikipedia presence, such as Dutch, Polish, and Swedish. What was found is that thre is hardly any negative opinion about the the project itself; and any such critique has focused on the ways that articles have being integrated. For an article to be usefully translated into a target-Wiki it needs to be properly Wiki-linked, carry proper citations and use the formatting of the chosen target language as well as being properly proof-read. Certain large Wikis such as the Polish and Dutch Wikis have strong traditions of medical content, with their own editorial system, own templates and different ideas about what constitutes a good medical article. For example, there are not MEDRS (Polish,German,Romanian,Persian) guidelines present on other Wikis, and some Wikis have a stronger background of country-specific content.
 * Integration progress


 * Swedish Translation into Swedish has been difficult in part because of the amount of free, high quality sources out there already: patient info, for professionals. The same can be said for English, but has really given us all the more reason to try and create an unbiased and free encyclopedia of medical content. We want Wikipedia to act as an alternative to commercial sources, and preferably a really good one at that. Through extensive collaborative work and by respecting links and Sweden specific content the last unintegrated Swedish translation went live in May.
 * Dutch Dutch translation carries with it special difficulties, in part due to the premises in which the Dutch Wikipedia is built upon. There is great respect for what previous editors have created, and deleting or replacing old content can be frowned upon. In spite of this there are success stories: Anafylaxie.
 * Polish Translation and integration into Polish also comes with its own unique set of challenges. The Polish Wikipedia has long been independent and works very hard to create high quality contentfor Polish audience. Previous translation trouble has lead to use of unique templates with unique formatting, not least among citations. Add to this that the Polish Wikipedia does not allow template redirects and a large body of work is required for each article. (This is somewhat alleviated by a commissioned Template bot - to be released). - List of articles for integration
 * Arabic The Arabic Wikipedia community has been informed of the efforts to integrate content through both the general talk-page as well as through one of the major Arabic Wikipedia facebook-groups: مجتمع ويكيبيديا العربي, something that has been heralded with great enthusiasm.

Integration is the next step after any translation. Despite this it is by no means trivial, and it comes with its own hardships and challenges. Previously each new integrator has needed to dive into the fray with little help from previous integrations. Therefore we are creating guides for specific Wikis that make integration simple and straightforward, with guides for specific languages, and for integrating on small Wikis.
 * Integration guides

Instructions on how to integrate an article may be found here

News in short


 * To come
 * Medical editor census - Medical editors on different Wikis have been without proper means of communication. A preliminary list of projects is available here.
 * Proofreading drives


 * Further reading
 * Translators Without Borders
 * Healthcare information for all by 2015, a global campaign

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!